Mood:  lyrical

More for the record and for the reading. 

By: RapidRobert2
18 Apr 2007, 09:54 PM EDT
Msg. 182144 of 182150

When he doesn't have anything to bash about, he makes something up
By: tepe
31 May 2006, 04:50 PM EDT
Msg. 160082 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
VERTICAL Computer Systems...where did they come up with this name? Is there any meaning to it? Just curious.

---------------
Make it sound 'official' and some might sell..or not.
By: tepe
02 Jun 2006, 01:56 PM EDT
Msg. 160165 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 160164 by Broke38.)
Jump to msg. #
Trading has been very thin lately....nobody's buying or selling. It's "halted" by lack of interest.

--------------
SO AFTER ALL THAT BASHING AND CRYING - HE SAYS HE BOUGHT MORE!!

By: tepe
06 Jun 2006, 03:25 PM EDT
Msg. 160331 of 182140
Jump to msg. #
I picked up some more shares today based on the news. The lawfirm seems very credible, and it looks like this is the first step to enforcing VCSY's patents...the question is what they're worth, and will anyone license them.

I figure that we're holding up well in a market that's being trashed, so the downside may not be bad. I hated buying this high, but it looks like it's not going to dip much lower. If it goes up significantly like you guys predict, a half a penny won't matter. ;-)

Good luck!
---------
On the VERY day he says he BOUGHT, HE STARTS TO BASH IT AGAIN!
By: tepe
07 Jun 2006, 05:28 PM EDT
Msg. 160456 of 182140
(This msg. is a reply to 160452 by Kidstocks.)
Jump to msg. #
Kidstocks, hiring attorneys hasn't made them a penny yet, and may never. But that's the reason I increased my position yesterday....did you even read my post before you replied?

-----------
And, the most funny! He obviously knows NOTHING about the 'Fiber Optic' patent but starts bashing it with 'IT WON'T WORK'..the sky is falling routine. OH! And this is the day after he claims to have bought MORE

By: tepe
08 Jun 2006, 01:04 PM EDT
Msg. 160581 of 182140
(This msg. is a reply to 160529 by RapidRobert2.)
Jump to msg. #
FO Patent...

I don't know about any of you other tech guys, but the VCSY FO patent sounds like a bunch of BS to me. If I read it correctly, they propose to shrink an image using a lens (like using a pair of binoculars backward), then project that impage onto the end of a fiber, and expand it at the other end to project it onto a screen. There are no electronics involved, all optical transmission. First of all, any TINY defect in the fiber is going to cause distortion of the image. Any reflection of the image off of the sides of the fiber is going to do the same. That reflection off the sides is key to maintaining the integrity of a digital signal. If the fiber is bent AT ALL, it's going to cause that reflection.

Has VCSY ever demonstrated this in a real life application? Sure, in an idealistic world the concept might work, but the real world has a lot more challenges. This is a HUGE disappointment to me regarding this patent. I hope this isn't "the future" that VCSY is relying on because the physical challenges are insurmountable, IMO. :-(

-------------

Same stuff, the next day after he claims to have bought MORE but NOW he is an expert on 'Fiber Optic' patents....

By: tepe
08 Jun 2006, 02:37 PM EDT
Msg. 160616 of 182141
(This msg. is a reply to 160611 by clarenceb5.)
Jump to msg. #
Clarence, thats the part that is BS...can't be done. If it can, I'd love to see it but I'll bet even VCSY hasn't ever demonstrated it.

------------

My, MY! How easy he gets upset with FRANTIC PANIC....

By: tepe
09 Jun 2006, 06:00 PM EDT
Msg. 160951 of 182141
(This msg. is a reply to 160935 by RapidRobert2.)
Jump to msg. #
RR, it looks like you joined RB in 2000 too. Did you just come out of hiding to hype VCSY?

Take the bet azzwipe.
-----------------------
Now, we jump ahead about a week and he is still crying about knowing what a patent does and how the 'Fiber Optic' doesn't work..he became an expert in 24 hours. Or, so he sez.
By: tepe
19 Jun 2006, 01:47 PM EDT
Msg. 162219 of 182141
(This msg. is a reply to 162085 by ajax203.)
Jump to msg. #
Jeez, Ajax, you're dumber than I thought. You rant and rave about the company's intellectual property, and talk about "holographic images", "non-linear math", "phase-conjugate waveforms" and all that bullzhit. If this is how the FO patent works, then WHY AREN'T ANY OF THOSE DESCRIPTIONS IN THE PATENT???? YOu speculate about HOW it might be sone with some razzle-dazzle words, but you have no idea how it could actually be done....cuz it can't, as the patent describes it. Then you go on to say that the patent is impossible. LOL!!

The patent clearly says they use a simple lens to capture the image, shrink and collimate it OPTICALLY, and transmit it throught a single fiber, then use another lens to blow it back up...what an absolute JOKE!!! Just because a patent examiner approved the patent WITHOUT A DEMONSTRATION OF A WORKING MODEL, doesn't mean it will work. The examiner is obviously as stupid as you pumpers.

BTW, why hasn't RR2 told me what he does for a living? What do you do? I told you what I do. YOu guys are just hypesters and pumpers working for a brokerage, IMO
-------- 

MORE AT URL

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 12:16 AM EDT

Updated: Thursday, 19 April 2007 12:21 AM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  chillin'

Continued from the previous post and there will be more after this. I just can't resist the record.

By: RapidRobert2
18 Apr 2007, 09:54 PM EDT
Msg. 182144 of 182150

By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 03:10 PM EDT
Msg. 154975 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
figures,

I just bought a bunch, and the POS drops. I hope all you guys' hyping isn't just a big P&D...or you'll be reported to the SEC! LOL!!
---------------------

Yeah! A 'large' position while bashing to harm the company...
By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 05:04 PM EDT
Msg. 155015 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
Down 23% on 23+ million shares. Not looking good. I hope this thing holds because I just took a relatively large position in it.

What's the pending news on this stock?
----------------

By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 05:57 PM EDT
Msg. 155028 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 155026 by morristhesunman.)
Jump to msg. #
Morrisman, I meant is doesn't look good from a momentum point of view. Go ahead and ignore....seems people don't like to hear anything that's contrary to all the hype.

----------------
By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 07:40 PM EDT
Msg. 155055 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
Wow, you guys are really cool. Just put everyone on ignore and report anyone who asks questions for TOS violations. What a bunch of clowns you are. I hope you make some lunch money on your 100 shares of VCSY. WOuldn't want you to lose your investment. LOL!!
-------------

By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 07:51 PM EDT
Msg. 155059 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 155058 by riffraff51.)
Jump to msg. #
Riffraff, that's exactly what you are worthless riffraff. I have a big stake in this stock and I'm trying to get info. You and your ilk just want to hype and cheerlead, and if someone says something you don't like you just bash them. So go screw yourself along with mo.

I have said nothing illegal, #######! You and your pumpers are probably the ones trying to manipulate the stock price.
---------------
By: tepe
13 Apr 2006, 02:46 PM EDT
Msg. 155184 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 155183 by expurgator.)
Jump to msg. #
Looks like at least a couple of us bought into the past week's hype. I got interested in VCSY at around 2 cents, but I couldn't get money into my account fast enough. I eventually got in at 3.2 cents and 3.8 cents. Already sitting on a loss, and I should have learned from my past experience with penny stocks that it wouldn't last. The spike to 5.5 cents took a lot of people out that got in under 1 cent. Can't blame them, and they now appear to be the smart ones.

Hope there really is some substance to this company, and not just hype.

----------------
By: tepe
13 Apr 2006, 04:50 PM EDT
Msg. 155218 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
Are we the bagholders? I've seen it many times in my 20+ years of investing. Big penny stock firms line up their high dollar clients, buy millions of shares, then hype the stock up to 10-100X their entry price while the little guys snap it up in a feeding frenzy. they manipulate the price through stock newsletters and BBs. Then they sell out to all the little investors left holding the bag.

I swore I'd stay out of pennies....but it's too tempting.

------------
By: tepe
17 Apr 2006, 04:40 PM EDT
Msg. 155976 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 155975 by repolives.)
Jump to msg. #
I should have known better than to buy on a spike! :-(

--------------
trashing the patents and doesn't even know what a patent is or how to read about one
By: tepe
04 May 2006, 01:40 PM EDT
Msg. 157736 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 157726 by 4sirius2.)
Jump to msg. #
4serius2, I have a few patents myself, and often patents are just pieces of paper with no real value to speak of. I am not familiar with computer software and OS's, but I have worked in the computer industry for ~30 years, mainly in hardware. I see patents filed all the time that aren't really worth much.

Hopefully, the VCSY patents will produce something of value for us. I'll be watching....
-----------
He is geting a lil frustrated and doesn't even know what a 'patent' is or does?????? Says it all....
By: tepe
17 May 2006, 08:40 PM EDT
Msg. 159152 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
So where is the BEEF!? To he11 with "slowly opening the door" to show the world what VCSY is up to, let's throw the sucker open and get with the program. That last PR about selling someone else's products was pretty lame IMO. What's the big deal about that, and is that as good as they can come up with?

I just read an article where patents are now taking up to 6 years to get reviewed by the USPTO. Does VCSY really have any patents ISSUED, or just applications filed? What is their game plan? Sorry, I am getting a little frustrated, even though the stock price is hanging in there in a down market.

Should I buy more? ;-)
---------------
He certainly likes to protect MMs for some reason and shows up with more anger when they are mentioned on the board, like TODAY
By: tepe
26 May 2006, 12:33 PM EDT
Msg. 159836 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 159826 by beachbumlb.)
Jump to msg. #
You guys and all your MM talk! There is no "they're holding us down" or crap like that. A MM is a "MARKET MAKER". their job is to make a market in the stock, and generate volume. They make money on the bid/ask spread and it doesn't matter where the stock price is. I am amuzed when I hear all of the talk about "they won't let us go"...."they're walking us down"....BS! The stock is driven by supply and demand. If people wnat to buy it, the pps will rise.

---------------------------
By: tepe
26 May 2006, 06:28 PM EDT
Msg. 159877 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 159865 by lumster50.)
Jump to msg. #
Lumpster, up yours. You're one of the mindless cheerleaders here, and if anyone asks a question they're obviously a "basher" to you and your buddies. I'm long on this stock and want to see VCSY succeed..... which part don't you understand?
----------- 

MUCH MORE AT URL 

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:59 PM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:59 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  bright

I couldn't fit the whole thing here, but you should print out the original at Raging Bull VCSY message board for future reference. It appears there is going to be a continuing effort to disparage and slander VCSY, their management and shareholders.

Apparently the war against VCSY continues... that's ok. We got plenty of oomph left. 

By: RapidRobert2
18 Apr 2007, 09:54 PM EDT
Msg. 182144 of 182150

**** For the record, from his very FIRST posts on the VCSY board, tepe has been bashing and posting nonsense, misinformation and just plain false information to harm the company. For what purpose does someone say they bought the stock and start immediately to BASH that investment??? Is he paid to bash it? Or, does he have another AGENDA against VCSY? Did he work for company against VCSY at one time? Does he work for a company competing against VCSY? Is he a former employee who got sued and lost out on the big bucks by VCSY?

Don't forget to check his last two posts below, wild and....!

He has to have an agenda to spend ALL HIS TIME bashing this company, attacking supporters of the company and TOSSING those supporters!

WHY is the question and some day we will find out the 'why (?) he started from his first posts and continues daily to try to harm VCSY and OUR investment. He can't take his money to the bank, I HAVE IT, but he can take those words to the bank.

Now, a short review of his posts just to know how he started....BASHING....

By: tepe
10 Apr 2006, 04:47 PM EDT
Msg. 154043 of 182138
Jump to msg. #
Up 100% in a couple days!!! It's BOUND to drop! It's not sustainable!
-----------------
By: tepe
10 Apr 2006, 04:50 PM EDT
Msg. 154054 of 182138
Jump to msg. #
Back to $0.001. Nothing here but fluff.

--------------------
By: tepe
10 Apr 2006, 04:58 PM EDT
Msg. 154074 of 182138
(This msg. is a reply to 154057 by buyingthefarmin09.)
Jump to msg. #
Dropping now....will peter out by the close.

---------------
By: tepe
10 Apr 2006, 04:59 PM EDT
Msg. 154075 of 182138
(This msg. is a reply to 154060 by pulcan.)
Jump to msg. #
I AGREE WITH PULCAN! Too much of a run-up too fast! Sell and wait to buy lower.
------------------------
By: tepe
11 Apr 2006, 04:48 PM EDT
Msg. 154503 of 182138
(This msg. is a reply to 154495 by pocketsmt101.)
Jump to msg. #
No selling? Where the hell do you think the stock that's being bought is coming from? SELLERS! You guys are so friggin stoopid!

----------------------
This one is actually more than a few words to disrupt the board and bash...
By: tepe
11 Apr 2006, 07:51 PM EDT
Msg. 154569 of 182138
(This msg. is a reply to 154565 by thevirginiahen.)
Jump to msg. #
"I had a long talk with a very good friend of mine today who is a stock broker. At lunch we discussed many things including stocks and trading in general. he told me that any stock on the OTC is very risky and many professional traders won't touch them, in fact it is illegal to buy an OTC stock for a client for a pension fund, institutution etc. Brokers are restricted from many areas of investing due to the volitilty of the stocks. They cannot take your money and put it in a stock such as VCSY, its not allowed. I read on this board where several posters posted that big names were buying this stock, I was assured that is in fact NOT happening, and he laughed.
Beware of the people on this board that post such things as it is all a bunch of lies aimed at trying to get you to either buy it or hold it.
VCSY is a VERY RISKY stock regardless of what you are told. Big name brokers will not buy it until it is listed on a major exchange and over $5.00 a share. Thats what I was told."

This is what I saw posted somewhere.
-----------------
By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 02:21 PM EDT
Msg. 154962 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
Bashing or hyping...it's all attempted stock manipiulation. I doubt the SEC is going to do anything. I doubt if anyone even reported anyone. Just big words and threats. LOL!!! Just placed my second order on this dip
--------------
By: tepe
12 Apr 2006, 02:23 PM EDT
Msg. 154963 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 154922 by 4sirius2.)
Jump to msg. #
What "false information" was posted? I didn't see any. Bashing and saying the stock is going to drop isn't "false information".
------------------
After all that bashing, he claims he BOUGHT MORE 

MUCH, MUCH MORE AT URL 

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:40 PM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:53 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  caffeinated

And for those of you who need a picture drawn, it's not rocket science you know... Look at this diagram and ask yourself 'What is so hard about XML? What is so hard about XML?' and tap your heels together three times and you will find yourself in the land of Moronvia where duplicated efforts mean nothing and architectural sketches stand for zip.

What? Maybe I should draw this on the back of a dollar? 

 BIG, ain't it?

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 4:27 PM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 4:42 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  hug me

From RagingBull VCSY board: 

By: RapidRobert2
18 Apr 2007, 01:56 PM EDT
Msg. 182063 of 182069

NITE isn't allowing ANY trades on the ASK! Guess they are upset over their bad thinking that VCSY wasn't going to file and VCSY DID! VCSY not only filed but 'resolved' the lawsuit...both in the same day and catching NITE short shares.

Now, NITE is sitting on the ASK and holding all trades at or above it.

The revenge of the other MM's should start soon.

RR
IMOi??
- - - - -
View Replies »

By: stillwtr19
18 Apr 2007, 01:58 PM EDT
Msg. 182066 of 182069

It seems to me that NITE should be attempting to make a market instead of surpressing one. Here in the last few days there were well over 6m shares traded mostly buys so where does the market indicate the interests are? I rest my case...plain and simple anyone not understanding this?

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

By: longandstrong1
18 Apr 2007, 02:00 PM EDT
Msg. 182068 of 182069
(This msg. is a reply to 182063 by RapidRobert2.)

Short volume is huge and there are so many reasons to buy. NITE is scaring the rest that want to get in! lol funny this wont happen when this gets to .03 and higher!!! We need more curagous people to step in inmho i already loaded the boat yesterday and plan to with my next paycheck!! Good luck to you all as i am loading the boat come friday morn!i??

By: joeh7777
18 Apr 2007, 02:25 PM EDT
Msg. 182070 of 182078

Nite MM - in the news - Ouch!

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-173.htm

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,88013.shtml

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=42633

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

- - - - -
View Replies »
 

By: beachbumlb
18 Apr 2007, 02:30 PM EDT
Msg. 182071 of 182078
(This msg. is a reply to 182070 by joeh7777.)

Could this be Nighty Night for NITE?

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

- - - - -
View Replies »

By: down-but-not-out0
18 Apr 2007, 02:50 PM EDT
Msg. 182076 of 182080
(This msg. is a reply to 182074 by beachbumlb.)

beach - if everyone would file a formal complaint to the SEC on their website, the overall complaints about MM=NITE would most likely raise an SEC eyebrow. (imho)

COMPLAINT DEPARTMENT 

SEC Complaint URL: www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

By: popjason
18 Apr 2007, 02:54 PM EDT
Msg. 182078 of 182079
(This msg. is a reply to 182071 by beachbumlb.)

beach,
two of those articles are 3 years old and all are related to knight screwing some of their institutional customers 7 years ago.
even though this is very bad, i'm not sure how this impacts vcsy. i don't think there is a lot of institutional buying and selling of vcsy. jmho

popi??
- - - - -
View Replies »
 

By: arthurarnsley
18 Apr 2007, 03:18 PM EDT
Msg. 182084 of 182090
(This msg. is a reply to 182070 by joeh7777.)

joeh7777 - The SEC press release has a date of 2004 for illegal activity in 2000 against institutional investors. Knight paid a big fine.

Knight continues to play a dominant MM role for VCSY. It is disturbing to see the VCSY price being beat down continually every time it tries to rise a tenth of a cent. I'd like to see the VCSY PPS go up a bit, but apparently it will only rise when the revenue rises.

Today's verdict announcement should have a positive effect, maybe, of another cent or so over the next week, if the MM's don't beat it down continually. We'll see.

Arthur

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Hold; LT Rating- Hold)

By: mm-buster
18 Apr 2007, 04:17 PM EDT
Msg. 182100 of 182100
(This msg. is a reply to 182081 by tepe.)

tepe, we all can see how hard you and NITE are working to lie cheat and steal from investors! imo

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

By: willgro
18 Apr 2007, 04:32 PM EDT
Msg. 182101 of 182101
(This msg. is a reply to 182084 by arthurarnsley.)

arthurarnsley's, Why in the world do you think the MM,s Will let this pony run. Ever time the mm,s beat it down they have a chance of lining their own pockets. I only hope they have huge shorts that they will have to fill.. If this is the case ,a good run will take this one up 2-3 cents. JMH0 Best Willgro. I hold bhub. The mm is short 1,500,000,000. How would you like to cover that short.???
At this point in time I think all is well, Very well. For all LONGS that have waited this one out.. Good Luck To Alli??

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 2:18 PM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 4:42 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  don't ask

I'm going to start sprinkling a few stories around here to give one a view as to the curiousness of Apple recent Leopard delay. Just as curious as the Microsoft Vista/Longhorn and Viridian delays and just as curious as Ross Systems being bought out of the blue by CHINA.

All very curious and, to my mind, all having a central theme. XML is too hard to do.

Here's just one opinion about Apple's poop on a plate..

Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard delay is a leadership failure

Tuesday, April 17, 2007 - 09:23 AM EDT

"On April 12th, Apple announced that Mac OS X 10.5, Leopard, will be delayed from the original 'Spring 2007' ship date. Now it won't ship until October," John Martellaro writes for The Mac Observer.

"Considering that Apple had until June 21st (1806 UT) to ship Leopard, this is only a four month delay. In terms of OS releases, in general, this is no big deal some have said," Martellaro writes.

"Well, yes it is," Martellaro writes. "It's actually a big deal because Apple had it within its power to avoid this setback."

Martellaro writes, "Apple could have avoided this Leopard delay with good old fashioned management leadership. They could have allowed themselves to grow and mature a little. They could have empowered their key VPs to figure out what it would take to ship Mac OS X/Leopard on time, with excellence and exercise some authority. Unfortunately, many of Apple's key VPs aren't Lieutenant Generals. They're Lieutenant Colonels."

"Alas, Apple's psychology and operating style is trapped in the $6B Valley of Death syndrome and not moving into a 21st century consumer electronics company that's poised to move from $25B to, perhaps, $40B in just a few years," Martellaro writes. "To get there in good shape, Apple will have to spend some money on something besides a half billion dollar new campus, forget the ghosts of the Michael Spindler and Gil Amelio eras, empower their VPs, and let their VPs become responsible for their own products, staff and OPEX."

Full article - highly recommended - here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader "LinuxGuy and Mac Prodigal Son" for the heads up.]

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 1:40 PM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 1:47 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Just FYI about CDC/Ross and emPath. 

By: stillwtr19
18 Apr 2007, 10:55 AM EDT
Msg. 182002 of 182002

a repost*...Been missing to much lately and I'm excited so I thought this post should be looked at again and in the event anyone missed it see what you might be able to add to it. This infor. should be sent to Vertical. Its concise and accurate...thoughts?

By: stillwtr19
15 Apr 2007, 11:51 PM EDT
Msg. 181699 of 182001
Jump to msg. #
Ok, heres something interesting Arthur....

from press releases the following info.

April 2002—Platinum China Limited Platinum China a leading provider of human resources and payroll management software in China, with operations in Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, and Hong Kong. Serving over 700 customers, ranging from multinationals to small and medium-sized domestic companies to state-owned enterprises, Platinum China is committed to helping customers realize maximum benefits from their investment in business software applications.

I have not found anything from press releases indicating CDC having an HRM suit for the United States BUT there appears to be notations all over the Ross and CDC corporate web pages indicating that a product may exist. The following information is about the transaction related to the HRM suit as reported but pertaining specifically to the Asian markets. Mainly China....

If this company is doing business in Asia as the tidbits of press releases indicate the question is ??? DOES chinadotcom have this Platinum HRM suit for the United States and to what extent could they be infringing with emPath if such a scenerio is present.

Here are the following tidbits...

Chinadotcom acquires a Majority Stake in OpusOne Technologies in early 2001 the investment will increase chinadotcom's high margin, recurrent revenue streams through an expanded IP portfolio targeting Mainland China.

One of the leading products developed by OpusOne is OpusOne PowerHRP, a Human Resources & Payroll Management software solution first introduced to the market in January 1998. This proprietary software is localized for the Mainland China market with a simplified Chinese interface and meets the various tax, statutory benefits and administrative requirements of different Mainland China provinces as well as Hong Kong.

CDC corporation an internet company in Asia, today announced the acquisition of a majority stake in OpusOne Technologies International Inc. (OpusOne), a leading developer of the OpusOne Power Suite of business management software solutions for state enterprises and multi-national corporations in Greater China.
 

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:00 AM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:03 AM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

By: morrie33
18 Apr 2007, 12:01 AM EDT
Msg. 181958 of 181966

I appreciate all the interest in the interest, but let's not gloss over the major points here...

VCSY from the OTC took on a NASDAQ company and WON in court. The monetary figures are good, but in the big picture, VCSY took a huge step forward in credibility in the business world. They have been fighting this case now for years at what cost to their company, and it's over with a victory. Let's not forget that point in our rush to count hundreds of thousands of dollars. Of course the money is good, but today VCSY became a real company.

Here's a rehash: VCSY filed on time. The Court case is over. And again, VCSY beat a NASDAQ company. As others have speculated this could have a major effect on other infringement cases and might push some other big companies to settle instead of try VCSY in court. A big twist twist twist on their arms.

Welcome to the world of big business VCSY. We've been waiting a long time for this.

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)

--- 

Now Solutions Successfully Resolves Its Lawsuit Against Ross Systems
Wednesday April 18, 10:00 am ET

According to the company's chief litigation lawyer, Derek Wolman of Snow Becker Krauss P.C., NOW Solutions was given a verdict in its breach of contract claim against Ross Systems in the net amount of $1,300,000, which was calculated after deducting all amounts due to Ross Systems pursuant to its claim against Now Solutions under a promissory note. NOW Solutions is also entitled to receive interest and attorney's fees on its breach of contract claim. The amount of the award is subject to a final judgment to be signed by the court.

``We are delighted with the court's ruling in this matter. This lawsuit has been a strain on NOW Solutions and VCSY in terms of time, energy and resources for over 4 years,'' said Richard Wade, President and CEO of VCSY and Chairman of Now Solutions. ``We can now refocus our resources towards attaining our business objectives''.

MORE AT URL 

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 10:14 AM EDT

Updated: Wednesday, 18 April 2007 10:29 AM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  accident prone

Daddy says climbing down from that pine tree he has the flippin farts where he don't know whether it's a banana or a sundae. He said come ask you. What does that mean Aunt Jaska?

Y'all I don't know nothing 'bout jerkin' no soda. Go ask your grandpa.

Grandpa's in the home.

I'll call you a cab.

Controversial Microsoft Silverlight Ad Campaign

Microsoft is using some controversial imaging to promote its new Silverlight tehcnology. The “Light up the web” slogan is being shown to be analgous to smoking crack cocaine. Does Microsoft think that Silverlight is as addictive as hard narcotics? Microsoft has been quiet so far and has not responded to the controversy. Below is one of the ads. You decide.

Lee

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 8:28 PM EDT

Updated: Tuesday, 17 April 2007 8:31 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink