Mood:
lyricalNow Playing: 'Over Under Around and Poo' Plumber pipes himself into institutional care. Wobly Bollings / Ramit Hotcha (French subtitles)
Topic: The Sneaky Runarounds
More for the record and for the reading.
By: RapidRobert2
18 Apr 2007, 09:54 PM EDT
Msg. 182144 of 182150
When he doesn't have anything to bash about, he makes something up
By: tepe
31 May 2006, 04:50 PM EDT
Msg. 160082 of 182139
Jump to msg. #
VERTICAL Computer Systems...where did they come up with this name? Is there any meaning to it? Just curious.
---------------
Make it sound 'official' and some might sell..or not.
By: tepe
02 Jun 2006, 01:56 PM EDT
Msg. 160165 of 182139
(This msg. is a reply to 160164 by Broke38.)
Jump to msg. #
Trading has been very thin lately....nobody's buying or selling. It's "halted" by lack of interest.
--------------
SO AFTER ALL THAT BASHING AND CRYING - HE SAYS HE BOUGHT MORE!!
By: tepe
06 Jun 2006, 03:25 PM EDT
Msg. 160331 of 182140
Jump to msg. #
I picked up some more shares today based on the news. The lawfirm seems very credible, and it looks like this is the first step to enforcing VCSY's patents...the question is what they're worth, and will anyone license them.
I figure that we're holding up well in a market that's being trashed, so the downside may not be bad. I hated buying this high, but it looks like it's not going to dip much lower. If it goes up significantly like you guys predict, a half a penny won't matter. ;-)
Good luck!
---------
On the VERY day he says he BOUGHT, HE STARTS TO BASH IT AGAIN!
By: tepe
07 Jun 2006, 05:28 PM EDT
Msg. 160456 of 182140
(This msg. is a reply to 160452 by Kidstocks.)
Jump to msg. #
Kidstocks, hiring attorneys hasn't made them a penny yet, and may never. But that's the reason I increased my position yesterday....did you even read my post before you replied?
-----------
And, the most funny! He obviously knows NOTHING about the 'Fiber Optic' patent but starts bashing it with 'IT WON'T WORK'..the sky is falling routine. OH! And this is the day after he claims to have bought MORE
By: tepe
08 Jun 2006, 01:04 PM EDT
Msg. 160581 of 182140
(This msg. is a reply to 160529 by RapidRobert2.)
Jump to msg. #
FO Patent...
I don't know about any of you other tech guys, but the VCSY FO patent sounds like a bunch of BS to me. If I read it correctly, they propose to shrink an image using a lens (like using a pair of binoculars backward), then project that impage onto the end of a fiber, and expand it at the other end to project it onto a screen. There are no electronics involved, all optical transmission. First of all, any TINY defect in the fiber is going to cause distortion of the image. Any reflection of the image off of the sides of the fiber is going to do the same. That reflection off the sides is key to maintaining the integrity of a digital signal. If the fiber is bent AT ALL, it's going to cause that reflection.
Has VCSY ever demonstrated this in a real life application? Sure, in an idealistic world the concept might work, but the real world has a lot more challenges. This is a HUGE disappointment to me regarding this patent. I hope this isn't "the future" that VCSY is relying on because the physical challenges are insurmountable, IMO. :-(
-------------
Same stuff, the next day after he claims to have bought MORE but NOW he is an expert on 'Fiber Optic' patents....
By: tepe
08 Jun 2006, 02:37 PM EDT
Msg. 160616 of 182141
(This msg. is a reply to 160611 by clarenceb5.)
Jump to msg. #
Clarence, thats the part that is BS...can't be done. If it can, I'd love to see it but I'll bet even VCSY hasn't ever demonstrated it.
------------
My, MY! How easy he gets upset with FRANTIC PANIC....
By: tepe
09 Jun 2006, 06:00 PM EDT
Msg. 160951 of 182141
(This msg. is a reply to 160935 by RapidRobert2.)
Jump to msg. #
RR, it looks like you joined RB in 2000 too. Did you just come out of hiding to hype VCSY?
Take the bet azzwipe.
-----------------------
Now, we jump ahead about a week and he is still crying about knowing what a patent does and how the 'Fiber Optic' doesn't work..he became an expert in 24 hours. Or, so he sez.
By: tepe
19 Jun 2006, 01:47 PM EDT
Msg. 162219 of 182141
(This msg. is a reply to 162085 by ajax203.)
Jump to msg. #
Jeez, Ajax, you're dumber than I thought. You rant and rave about the company's intellectual property, and talk about "holographic images", "non-linear math", "phase-conjugate waveforms" and all that bullzhit. If this is how the FO patent works, then WHY AREN'T ANY OF THOSE DESCRIPTIONS IN THE PATENT???? YOu speculate about HOW it might be sone with some razzle-dazzle words, but you have no idea how it could actually be done....cuz it can't, as the patent describes it. Then you go on to say that the patent is impossible. LOL!!
The patent clearly says they use a simple lens to capture the image, shrink and collimate it OPTICALLY, and transmit it throught a single fiber, then use another lens to blow it back up...what an absolute JOKE!!! Just because a patent examiner approved the patent WITHOUT A DEMONSTRATION OF A WORKING MODEL, doesn't mean it will work. The examiner is obviously as stupid as you pumpers.
BTW, why hasn't RR2 told me what he does for a living? What do you do? I told you what I do. YOu guys are just hypesters and pumpers working for a brokerage, IMO
--------
