Mood:
irritatedNow Playing: Why Didn't You Tell Me You Was Double-Shackin' Round?
Topic: The Sneaky Runarounds
This is the most 'sense' this guy has said in a year. Only problem is it doesn't stand up against the facts as we've seen them in print.
Now we know where his familiarities and loyalties lie.
Did I say 'lie'?
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=181541
By: tepe
12 Apr 2007, 06:47 PM EDT
Msg. 181541 of 181570
(This msg. is a reply to 181530 by willgro.)
The problem is you guys are using RR2's interpretation of the "facts" to form your view of this case. Obviously there is bias in the representation of those "facts". There is another side to the case that is not presented by the pumpers, and if there wasn't some validity to it I doubt Ross would have pushed this case to court. First of all, Ross believes that VCSY owes them money. Secondly, they probably don't believe they've violated anything that VCSY claims they violated. Wasn't this case thrown out of court once? That should tell you something.
- - - - -
View Replies »
Just watch how the truth rips his view to pieces. Hmmm CDC Operative? Or somebody around their?
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=181549
By: RapidRobert2
12 Apr 2007, 07:52 PM EDT
Msg. 181549 of 181570
(This msg. is a reply to 181541 by tepe.)
tp: While I like to ignore YOU, I simply can NOT allow your misinformation and false presentation of the FACTS stand without comment.
The 'other' side is screwed and they know it. The 'other' side HAD a judge that didn't understand or didn't care to apply the law and the case had some 'claims' of VCSY 'thrown out' as you state but VERY QUICKLY the appellate court reinstated ALL of the VCSY claims and sent a message to Judge Lowe to follow their orders in that decision (YOU can NOT say you didn't see the appellate decision since I've posted it many times on THIS board). As recently as this week the current Judge, Judge Solomon made the statement she couldn't see why Lowe allowed this case to go to trial and was looking at the defense at the time, which she just finished scolding again for something. It is unusual for one Judge to question the actions of another judge (call it the cloak of robes) but Judge Jane Solomon certainly did and obviously, she would have ruled in favor of the VCSY 'summary judgment' motion and not against it like Judge Lowe did. That says something, too.
That should tell YOU SOMETHING!!! The APPELLATE court liked the case of VCSY and NOT the one by Ross Systems. The same decision will come from the appellate court if VCSY wins and Ross appeals. Plus, Ross will have to come up with a bundle of money for a bond to guarantee payment of the award should they LOSE AGAIN in the court of appeals. And, don't forget the interest that will be added to the amount of the award during the appeal process. Ross will be foolish to appeal ANY decision against it by the jury.
But, continue to post nonsense and false information, you've done that for a year now while 'claiming' you are a shareholder.
I try not to present a bias with the 'facts' but when it is sooo VERY obvious Ross is in the wrong, did the deeds, and tried to cover some stuff up that came out in 'discovery' that I probably do give my view of what is going on. If someone has a different view, fine! As long as they have the right 'FACTS' to back up their conclusions and don't post false information, like you are doing today.
Good Luck! I would love to see your face if VCSY wins the case next Tuesday.
RR
IMO
Ps: Now back to ignoring your comments of nonsense about VCSY and other posters.i??
That's how you're supposed to break it down. OK Let's try that again.
Yeah. Sorry I can't go through anymore drivel from the operative. Let's just skip to RR. If you want to read tepe posts you can find a ton of them at RagingBull VCSY.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=181556
By: RapidRobert2
12 Apr 2007, 08:11 PM EDT
Msg. 181556 of 181570
(This msg. is a reply to 181525 by bart2e.)
bartz: Well, I don't see, after the comments from the judge this week about the case and the Ross lawyers that the good Judge Solomon will look at their case favorably. I've heard she only yells at them, like only a Judge Judy can do it.
Why is Ross engaged in the battle. Well, the answer is because they have NO CHOICE. VCSY brought the lawsuit against Ross and Ross countered with one small one which is only worth $750k. I don't think Wade would settle with them since I think he wants to go after bigger fish when this case is decided. Remember, there is a new lawsuit filed by NOW Solutions against ROSS for 4.1 million plus $$$. I think that is only the beginning for VCSY and Ross/CDC.
Ross only claims they weren't paid the last installment of the purchase price which is the $750k they countered for. Thats it.
I suggest reading the appellate court decision for the other answers to your question and get it right from the court, I posted it just today, again. It explains the case and claims and does a nice job of summary of it all. That is better than asking me how VCSY has been harmed, although from your post it seems like you are asking how Ross was harmed and what chance the judge will see it their (ross) way. You don't want 'none' as the answer so I will simply say that there is ZERO chance the judge will see it the way of Ross Systems.
And, don't forget how important the judge can be when she gives the instructions to the jury. She can sway a jury, easily. Of course, VCSY might lose it, but if they do they will go down fighting and WIN it in the appellate court...AGAIN.
So, we wait for a win win for VCSY and NOW Solutions.
Even if they lose, they will win it in the LONG run and they have more going on than just this court case.
GOOD LUCK VCSY!!!!!! WIN IT FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS THAT ARE IN THE COURT DAILY SUPPORTING VCSY!
That sez it all.
RR
IMOi??
