Mood:

Now Playing: 'All The Live Wrong Day' Workers railroaded into dark tunnel revolt and take train. (Adventure / Swashbuckles)
Topic: Microsoft and VCSY
And Microsoft is all, like, 'we can do that too'. So where is it June 2003? IBM said they were into Web Services. MSFT said they were in too Web Services too.
We see IBM's web services all the way back from here to there consistently engaged. We's been watching Microsoft duck and weave from here back to there but we STILL don't see MSFT's web services.
What gives?
By: 4sirius1
07 Jun 2003, 10:53 AM EDT
Msg. 113966 of 184832
(This msg. is a reply to 79186 by ÿinvalid_sender.)
***A VERTICAL FUTURE***
Take a look at this older but descriptive article to remind you of the vision and the opportunities before
Vertical. See post# 71968.
I've heard it also means $7 trillion in business
conducted on the Net over the next several years. The article underlines the net effect on business as 12%
added to revenues and 42% reduction in labor costs.
What companies will be able to afford not to have that capability in the future???
Vertical is worth many times more than it's current market cap of $3 million using the pocket calculator. But we're using it to look forward.
Now use some judgment after you consider what Vertical offers to Global E-Commerce.
By the way, it has become old research that Web Services
from IBM, MSFT and others would begin to ramp up in the
3rd quarter 2003--we may be on the cusp.
- - - - -
View Replies »
sniff sniff bbblllllaaaaattt fried oysters
Makes me nostalgic when I was posting on Raging Bull. It's like gettting run out of the tenements but I'd a much rather walked out on my own. That 79186 by ÿinvalid_sender. That's me. I used to call myself ÿinvalid when I went into bars full of Svedish waitresses.
No I'm kidding, silly. Svedish is not a real word. You can see 79186 isn't a valid message either. That's because it was removed. I was once a proud portuno_diamo on raging bull but they took me off at recy43's insistence and silenced the tomes for ever... well, not exactly, I went over to PHeaven (my card: http://www.programmersheaven.com/c/authorpage.asp?AuthorID=118252 ) where I was joined by a grope of likeminded RB longs and made a public site there As VCSY - A Laughing Place [aka the treefort, Port Uno, Winky's Wicked Wicker aimed at a special audience and a backchannel [most likeely still as I see many still log on - no doubt to likewise backchannel pro and con - pheaven was a delight for wringing out speculation - much of the long cockiness you see on RB is due to the degree of certainty they've reached in their DD and projection of facts they have found with the likelihood of scenarios. It to conversate what they call managed risk in a consensus weighted skylark of an 'investment'. The 'you gotta be crazy' quotient somehow or someway clicks across the 'I once was blind but now i see' line on the Figgerdair and it's a whole new world of stations.] about VCSY but he followed us there and insisted the webmaster get rid of the site. We went private as a forum after that, got socialized with our stufy habits and background and now that's 100 ants from a mound that were just recently kicked out right after the lawsuit against .Net by VCSY. I guess being a .Net developer, the webmaster didn't want to see what was going to hit.
So we get shoveled out to other venues like this one and Number 2.
And now we burrow even deeper because we gain a more widely spread coverage with an already deepened social structure content and efficient with messages laid down by a scent trail - some may pick it up some may not but it guides you to the riches that will guranatee the next generation of eggs.
And to give you a sense of history and prospective, I offer you this trail sign from a little outpost on the edge of reality called ... the highlight zone.
Color me Curious
Not the cat, stupid, this:
http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/bbs?post_id=1069916 better known as:
WARNING: Speed Bump... Maintain Truth
311 | Emily is a perfect fit | Portuno_Diamo | Mar 7 11:47P |
Then tell us we haven't been talking about all this 'new technology' stuff like web services, XML and extensible dynamic languages and framworks since the dotcom days. Where the hell has Microsoft and the information technology industry BEEN for all these years? Have they been wandering in the green fields of illgotten money while we property owners have had to water our lawns with our tears, sweat and, dare I say, wringing out the bedsheets after a long desperate night. Woe is me, woe is ... VIOLA! Gimme a beer! Woe is me.
So if your engine and tranny fall out from under yer ride , it ain't my fault you drive through this here residential neighborhood so fast.
You should stay a little longer and read a bit. You certainly will be doing that later trying to figger out where you missed your chance..
long in the tooth this tiger? Does this history relate to the dispute being discussed and if so is it not at the heart of current efforts in the MS development community.
2004--Monad and its "dadddy" -see section 5 of the video --on programmers-- stating that Monad is progressive evolution of .net and how it works with objects.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/theshow/episode.aspx?xml=theshow/en/Episode043/manifest.xml
2005---Microsoft cant decide if monad is in or out of Longhorn---Many want it in but Microsoft eventually says no---a later OS not Longhorn
2005 commentary---prior to it being pulled from Longhorn.
http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=windowsserver&seqNum=187&rl=1
Monad becomes Microsoft command shell, MSH, and now Powershell
http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=windowsserver&seqNum=187&rl=1
Gaining popularity--but still not to be in Longhorn---
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/hubs/msh.mspx
This is a big deal and may shake the MS tree by the roots---if Powershell AKA Monad and its .net foundation is founded on, or borrows from, patented property.
Or have I missed the point (here and of the lawsuit) entirely?
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/faq.mspx