Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« April 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics
Apple Fritters
Calamity
Chinadotcom and VCSY  «
DD to da RR
Endorsements
Facebook
GLOSSARY
Gurgle
HP and VCSY
Integroty
Microsoft and VCSY
Nobody Can Be That Stupid
Notable Opinions
Off the Wall Speculation
Panama
Pervasive Computing
Reference
SaaS
SOA
The DISCLAIMER
The Sneaky Runarounds
TIMELINE
VCSY
VCSY / Baseline
VCSY / Bashed
VCSY / Infotech
VCSY / MLE (Emily)
VCSY / NOW Solutions
VCSY - A Laughing Place #2
Friday, 6 April 2007
What it is when the dude drop the bag...
Mood:  quizzical
Topic: Chinadotcom and VCSY
E plurus post dictum mons publicus poundum downamus flickdis boogeris

E Pluribus Sputum:


resource: http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/Term/CDBD25E2-0C22-4452-89C87F8A413EE73B/alpha/M/

mens rea

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.



Having done so before I know the concept of mens rea may be used as an offense or a defense. The 'no doubt he intended to rip off Aunt Sally's piggy bank' assessment can flip over to a 'nobody's that stupid' view when faced with someone committing a crime and doing something as ludicrous as calling the victim and asking for help with problems the 'guilty party' is having with the projected ripoff.

Posters on message boards could use that defense to mitigate the fact they spend hours every day battering the forums of specific subjected stocks with no reasonable goal implied in the posts. Of course the 'nobody's stupid' toe grip on the highwire of criminal defense can set up oscillations in the wire until the judge's mind is thinking 'Wait a minute... NOBODY's THAT stupid.' and the opinion swings sharply toward discounting all that the defendant has to say regarding the 'addiction' or the 'obsession' or the 'altruistic avenger' within the defendant's apparent nefarious intent and actions.

So NOBODY'S that stupid? Stupid like a rabbit.

 

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 12:51 PM EDT
Updated: Friday, 6 April 2007 12:55 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
When whispers wither and the shoutings begin.
Mood:  a-ok
Topic: Chinadotcom and VCSY

I think I just peed my bippies.

 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=180966

By: RapidRobert2

06 Apr 2007, 11:22 AM EDT

Msg. 180966 of 180972
(This msg. is a reply to 180961 by Sliver_Fox.)

Sliver: For VCSY: Richard Wade, Steve Gunn, Marianne Franklin, Luiz Valdetaro, the CFO at the time (I forget his name) Ken Orgain, and one or two others.

For Ross, Robert Webster (CFO at the time, now a consultant), Tinley, CEO at the time..they were called out of order during the plaintiffs case. I don't know who else is left at Ross to put on unless they bring in Gary Geyselen (Arglen) and I don't think they would be that foolish to bring that guy in as a witness, VCSY lawyers could rip into him and he might even risk criminal charges if he said too much. Wade would love it, though.

Naw! No one will believe they just 'got' the software to use and not have to worry about paying for it. Besides, CDC would be responsible, Ross is a subsidiary and Tinley was the CEO of CDC for a few short months until he left under a cloud when CDC was also announcing they had crooks inside the company. NO way can CDC get around knowing they should not be using 'emPath'...if,indeed,they are using it to this day.

Later,
RR
IMO�
- - - - -
View Replies

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 12:29 PM EDT
Updated: Friday, 6 April 2007 1:39 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older