Mood:

Now Playing: "Pithed Off" Speech impediment prevents inventors from telling their stories (confidential chronicles)
Topic: Apple Fritters
« | March 2010 | » | ||||
![]() |
||||||
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
So, I have only one question.
If patent 6826744 and 7076521 are unenforceable, where are the flood of products that should be out there by now based on the patents?
Not.
We do see Microsoft pressing full steam ahead but that's to be expected. We know they have a license for 6826744 from July 2008.
Based on Microsoft's descriptions of Windows Mobile 7 they appear to be able to use 7076521.
but ...
We don't see Google, or Adobe or IBM trumpeting anything close.
Open-source? Amazon just licensed what Microsoft has. Just how "unenforceable" is this brave new web-based computing world?
Apparently not very.
If you don't believe it, simply enter a comment and explain why. I'm all ears... and fingers.
Just an update on the discussion topics of the "Who's Who On The MessageBoards?" Facebook Group. Feel free to join and participate in the discussions
I think it safe to say VCSY shareholders past and present would like to know just who this person is and what his connection with the affairs around the company might be.
The burning question would need a satisfying answer as to how an individual can justify spending years on a daily basis attacking shareholders.
265070 How many SUCKERS can a SUCKER SUCK if the SUCKER mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:45 PM
265069 Has Wade gotten back to any of you losers yet? LOL mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:30 PM
265068 What happened to emilysolutions.com? Anyone??? mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:29 PM
265067 emilysolutions.com is DEAD??? Very telling. Sad. LOL. mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:04 PM
265066 RIP emilysolutions.com: Guess nobody wants this crappy product. Must be too revolutionary for everyone. LMAO! mrrrfk 2/22/10 01:35 PM
I think it's a question shareholders will pursue relentlessly until that question is answered for the indicated poster and all who have accommodated him.
I would agree the trashers do more to keep the VCSY story alive than all the posts shareholders make. An example:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=265072
I think it would be safe to say all VCSY shareholders past and present and future would like to know who this person is and why he sees fit to spend years on a day by day basis attacking the shareholders.
265070 | How many SUCKERS can a SUCKER SUCK if the SUCKER | ![]() | mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:45 PM |
265069 | Has Wade gotten back to any of you losers yet? LO | ![]() | mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:30 PM |
265068 | What happened to emilysolutions.com? Anyone??? | ![]() | mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:29 PM |
265067 | emilysolutions.com is DEAD??? Very telling. Sad. | ![]() | mrrrfk 2/22/10 02:04 PM |
265066 | RIP emilysolutions.com: Guess nobody wants this c | ![]() | mrrrfk 2/22/10 01:35 PM |
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264321
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264326
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264340
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264342
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264356
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264359
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264362
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264363
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264367
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264369
As you can see the strategy to attempt to discredit VCSY management and shareholders is to make outlandish and slanderous statements, then to try to duck away and laugh it all off. This kind of behaviour has been going on for almost ten years from the same individual.
What does that make you think?
You should also consider the full range of such a poster's motivations.
Additional instances:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264495
By: 4sirius2 ![]() 15 Feb 2010, 10:51 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 264495 of 264501 (Reply to 264244 by mrrrfk) Jump to msg. # |
Mrrfk and links to yelling "Bankrupt" just on the IBM board under a few aliases. Mrrfk asked for links to my statement that he yelled "Bankrupt ![]() on various boards. In a few minutes I supplied a link to him saying GE would be bankrupt in 2 years. Now I have about a dozen links with 3 different aliases he used on the IBM board, Mmiirriirr, Whowhatwhywherewhen, and Reflect-on-this. Many of his other posts on the IBM board invoke the thought of "we are doomed" or "employees of this company will die of cancer." His handle of Piewhole is missing from that board, however he is addressed by that name by another VCSY investor, Portuno Diamo: http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=19479 Mirrorballz is not on the boards but we have this trace left: http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?member=mirrorballz RB did not reinstate post on RB from it's inception to early 2003 so we are missing various permutations of his handle for legofeel and others I may have overlooked or forgotten. Mmiirriirr 3 out of 15 posts on IBM board uses "Bankrupt" http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=17811 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=18161 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=18395 Whowhatwhywherewhen 4 out of 11 posts on IBM board uses "Bankrupt" http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=19615 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=19637 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=19642 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=19653 Reflect-on-this 2 out of 4 posts on IBM board uses "Bankrupt" http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=17811 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=18168 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=18395 - - - - - View Replies » |
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=264498
By: 4sirius2 ![]() 15 Feb 2010, 11:00 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 264498 of 264501 (Reply to 264495 by 4sirius2) Jump to msg. # |
Corrections: To post 264496: #18161 should read http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=18168 Reflect on this: posts http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=20370 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=20481 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IBM&read=20517 |
Play it again, Sam.
The name's Dave.
Darn. What bar is this?
Yes I've posted concerning this subject before and here it is again because I know you won't be able to find it. You'll just end up in the wrong place listening to the wrong tune again.
It's what you morons always do because you follow the word of "journalists" who do what the "businessmen" say so the "editors" will sign the check.
Meanwhile, all you ignorant saps spend millions for crap you'll just have to modernize.
And, might I add for the truly intransigent and stupid:
Three reasons that REST is not RPC
By: mirror_shmuck ![]() 06 Jul 2004, 11:05 AM EDT Rating: ![]() | Msg. 75257 of 120717 Jump to msg. # |
GE will be bankrupt in 2 years. You heard it here first. (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- No Position; ST Rating- Strong Sell; LT Rating- Strong Sell) - - - - - View Replies » |
By: mrrrfk ![]() 12 Jan 2010, 08:01 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261625 of 261635 (Reply to 261622 by tepe) Jump to msg. # |
Yeah, I'd love to hear from the SEC about this over-hyped POS. Portuno still has his PUMPING website up with all the BS (his own and other's) about VCSY that caused a lot of naive investors to lose money thinking they were investing in something world-changing. What a JOKE (unless you got tricked by those LIES for big bux.) I'll just point them to it LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!! (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- No Position; ST Rating- Strong Sell; LT Rating- Strong Sell) |
By: stillwtr19 ![]() 12 Jan 2010, 07:55 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261624 of 261636 (Reply to 261618 by trixijude) Jump to msg. # |
trixijude it's good that we have informed shareholders thanks for the article. I was just taken back by how so many of you are actually standing up in this forum keeping the faith about the company after all these years cause we certainly need better communication, and all of us have said this in various ways yet some of the bashers never hear this message while distorting the truth about many of us. I get tired being attacked by these shareless posters, and often ask myself what in the heck is there incentive being here in the first place since they hold NO shares. I believe in our patents, but it is frustrating when the CEO "to present" has not capitalized and built shareholder value. So when I see shareholders still keeping the faith about their investment it's quite moving. glty (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Hold) |
By: mrrrfk ![]() 12 Jan 2010, 08:25 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261635 of 261637 (Reply to 261632 by tbrog) Jump to msg. # |
Look at the pathetic losers begging 4s for more BS!!!! LMAO! - - - - - View Replies » |
By: mrrrfk ![]() 12 Jan 2010, 08:57 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261640 of 261641 (Reply to 261634 by hionvcsy) Jump to msg. # |
4s? 4s? please 4s, tell us a story, 4s? 4s? we need something to hope for, 4s? did a little birdie tell you something, 4s? something big, 4s? Big and juicy? Or just stinky? 4s? 4ssssssssssssssssssssss????????????????????????????? |
By: stillwtr19 ![]() 12 Jan 2010, 08:58 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261641 of 261641 (Reply to 261594 by trixijude) Jump to msg. # |
This copy and pasted post is worth another go around!! Posted earlier by trixijude Mindpix Corporation Discovers Identity of Notorious Corporate Cyber Basher 5:48p ET January 11, 2010 (GlobeNewswire) Mindpix Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (Pink Sheets:MPIX), would like to inform their valued shareholders that after years of being senselessly attacked on the internet financialsites ![]() "We were alerted by a press release on Jan. 4, 2010 (PSGI.News) that had been a target of Mr. Pippy. David Pippy, admitted according to the press release, that he was the Sky-King who posted on InvestorsHub. Upon discovery of this information I contacted Mr. Pippy at his office in Springfield, Illinois and once I identified myself, Mr. Pippy said he didn't want to talk to me. I also contacted legal counsel for the Comptroller's office and was told that they investigated Mr. Pippy's computer after other complaints and Mr. Pippy admitted to using it to post his comments. However, surprisingly, their office has elected to turn the matter over to the SEC instead of pursuing the matter further themselves," stated Thomas E. Aliprandi, Chairman of Mindpix. "We are elated to finally know who this basher is and can use this information for moving forward in a positive and productive manner. MPIX will pursue David Pippy, and anyone else involved, with all legal resources available," says Aliprandi. "I want to personally thank MPIX's shareholders and let them know that we are going to deal swiftly with this malicious attack and move on to new heights. We value your support." (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Hold) |
![]() 12 Jan 2010, 09:11 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261645 of 261645 (Reply to 261640 by mrrrfk) Jump to msg. # |
Mirror...................he is telling you a story. |
![]() 12 Jan 2010, 09:15 PM EST Rating: ![]() | Msg. 261646 of 261647 (Reply to 261645 by stockwabbit) Jump to msg. # |
Not much of a plot. |
(By narbytoes - replying to basher Al) Re: nothing is (royalty) FREE.......
"Number of Partners in the Microsoft Partner Program: 360,000
Number of Partners Affiliated with Microsoft: over 640,000
Number of Partner Companies in the World: 1.3 million
Percentage of Microsoft Revenue Stemming from Partners: 95 percent
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/events/wwpc/
I dont recall these players being mentioned in your analysis of the license agreement. Why is that?
-----------------------
Are you suggesting VCSY licensed the patent and subsequent/associated software to 1.3 million companies in a single fee? Interesting
----------------------
"Percentage of Microsoft Revenue Stemming from Partners: 95 percent"
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/events/wwpc/
Wow,....I wonder if the agreement only covered in house use....roughly five percent of Microsoft's revenue. Theres really nothing in the statement to indicate otherwise. Thats pretty cheap cosidering what five percent amounts to...but then I wonder what 95 percent amounts to?
---------------------
We must assume 1.3 million companies would not have to pay 2.9 million.
1 300 000 x 2 900 000 = 3 770 000 000 000.
What is a sublicense worth.....now I'm just playing around, mind you,...but microsoft provides indemnity to its partners regarding IP...so whats a reasonble sublicense fee to cover their arse. How bout 1500 dollars per company. If they all subscribe...1500 dollars?
1.3 million x 1500 = one billion nine hundred fifty million
Probably pie in the sky....but it has nothing to do with whatever discussion may otherwise occur about royalties. A sublicence is not a royalty. Is it?
-------------------------
As far as royalties go...It seems reasonable VCSY would rather receive a percentage of the revenue from the developed use by the 1.3 million companies who partner with Microsoft...only a fraction of that revenue goes to Microsoft. That prospect would not be projected or reported in the civil settlement with Microsoft. This may or may not be the case...if it is ...it may also apply to the agreement with InFinitek...
url:
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_V/threadview?m=tm&bn=33693&tid=28048&mid=28048&tof=8&rt=1&frt=2&off=1