Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« March 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Apple Fritters
Calamity
Chinadotcom and VCSY
DD to da RR
Endorsements
Facebook
GLOSSARY
Gurgle
HP and VCSY
Integroty
Microsoft and VCSY
Nobody Can Be That Stupid
Notable Opinions
Off the Wall Speculation
Panama
Pervasive Computing
Reference
SaaS
SOA
The DISCLAIMER
The Sneaky Runarounds
TIMELINE
VCSY
VCSY / Baseline
VCSY / Bashed
VCSY / Infotech
VCSY / MLE (Emily)
VCSY / NOW Solutions
VCSY - A Laughing Place #2
Saturday, 1 March 2008
But the Norton said I was over Rhineshticken!
Mood:  caffeinated
Now Playing: 'Rumors Fall From The Sky' Bombardier blown from plane lands in hog pen. Benton D'Struckshin / Winsom Demerits
Topic: TIMELINE

Dates to Remember (some will live in infamy)

Fur das flickenshnotten und shitzenflippen en das messagenborden:

March 7, 2000 VCSY…acquired Emily Solutions

March 29, 2000 arsDigita Secures $35 Million via General Atlantic and Greylock

August 3, 2000 VCSY… beta release of two of its MLE (Markup Language Executive “Emily”) Solutions Suite products: the XML Catalog Enabler Agent and the XML Database Agent.

September 6, 2000 launch of an educational and informational Web site devoted to in-depth explanations of the company's XML-based software solutions. http://www.emilysolutions.com.

December 27, 2000 iNetPurchasing.com (iNPI) officially unveiled details of its strategic alliance and joint ventures with Vertical Computer Systems (VCSY) to use, market and sell VCSY's Emily™ XML technology for the B2G and B2B markets.

........

January 31, 2001 joint venture between iNet Government Services LLC (iNet) and Apollo Industries, Inc. ("Apollo") to form a separate LLC under the name "SmarteGov." Jerome Svigals, Director of MIS at Apollo and SmarteGov…generally regarded as the 'father of the magnetic stripe card.’

February 2, 2001 Barry Diller marriage to Diane von Furstenburg. Diller becomes Father-in-Law to Rober Miller via through Alexandre Prinz von Fürstenberg/Alexandra Miller 1995 marriage.

February 12, 2001 VCSY/Emily Solutions selected by IBM to be one of 40 companies now featured as innovation leaders on IBM’s new showcase Web site

February 20, 2001 Emily™ XML Enabler Agent is available for public purchase and download

March 13, 2001 Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. (OTCBB:VCSY), a  provider of Web commerce solutions, today announced that through Now Solutions, LLC, it has acquired a 60% majority interest in the Renaissance CS® Human Resources and Payroll (“HRIS/PAYROLL”) product division from Ross Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROSS). 

March 19, 2001  Microsoft releases Hailstorm

March 20, 2001 World Bank funds developmentgateway.org
(developmentgateway.org developed using arsDigita Community System software work)

September 5, 2001 acquisition of one hundred percent (100%) of Texas-based EnFacet, Inc., … "EnFacet’s innovations provide a strong synergy with our Emily enhancements"

November 1, 2001 VCSY…appointment of Stephen O. Rossetti to head the Company’s (Vertical Computers) new Government Affairs division to be headquartered in Washington D.C.

??2001 At some point during 2001 (bave, can you give the particulars re past email? - if you can dig them out and sanitize the name) iNet hosted the development of software to service a cluster computer
See comment to this post below. Thanks bave.

........ 

January 3, 2002 -- Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. (OTCBB: VCSY) announced today that it has acquired an option to … interest in iNetPurchasing, Inc. "iNet…current strong working relationship between VCSY and iNet … facilitated the testing and deployment of EmilyTM… throughout Texas, Maine, and Idaho"

February 4, 2002 arsDigita acquired by Red Hat Linux

February 21, 2002 contracted for the sale and installation of its ResponseFlash™ software to enhance emergency response communications for Marion County, Indiana, including Indianapolis, the state’s largest city…MECA (Metropolitan Emergency Communications Agency} serves the City of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana … wide variety of communications equipment, including more than 1,800 mobile devices, 8,000 handheld radios, 3,000 mobile radios and 5,000 pagers. MECA director Linn Piper is also chairperson of Motorola's Mobile Data Users Group (MDUG).

April 11, 2002 Microsoft pulls plug on Hailstorm

August 14, 2002 Grand River Hospital has selected NOW Solutions as their HRIS provider of choice…powerful capabilities and features of emPath™

September 18, 2002 licensing of emPath(TM) to Betty Ford Center
(Emily checks into rehab)

October 2, 2002 NOW Solutions…Northern Health Authority in Canada

November 25, 2002 NOW Solutions…upgrade and licensing of emPath™ to Cerebral Palsy Associations of New York State

November 27, 2002 NOW Solutions…upgrade and licensing of emPath(TM) to a large municipal(unnamed in release) government in New Mexico

........

July 6, 2003 Laughing Place #1 started on ProgrammersHeaven website -  (Webmaster for Programmersheaven is .Net MVP. Laughing Place #1 will be shut down by Programmersheaven webmaster April 25, 2007 - one week after VCSY sues Microsoft for infringement of patent 6826744).

July 18-28, 2003 AOL Time-Warner / Chinadotcom split up

September 8, 2003
Ross Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: ROSS), a global provider of enterprise software for manufacturers, and CDC Software Holdings Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of chinadotcom corporation (Nasdaq: CHINA), an integrated enterprise solution and software company, announced today that they have signed a definitive agreement whereby CDC Software will acquire Ross Systems in a merger valued at approximately US$68.9 million.

October 31, 2003 Microsoft releases Web Controls 1.0 for .Net. 

........

April 6, 2004 Google talks about WebOS. Microsoft stays quiet.
http://www.kottke.org/04/04/google-operating-system 

June 4, 2004 WHATWG open mailing list announced
"The Web Hypertext Applications Technology working group therefore intends to address the need for one coherent development environment for Web Applications."

August 27, 2004
chinadotcom corporation ("chinadotcom") (NASDAQ: CHINA; Website: www.corp.china.com), a leading integrated enterprise software and mobile applications company in China and internationally, today announced that it has completed its acquisition of Ross Systems, Inc. ("Ross Systems")

August 27, 2004 Longhorn rewrite announced. Winfs out of Longhorn.

August 31, 2004 VCSY SiteFlash Patent allowance
See USPTO PAIR Site at: http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
and use application number: 09/410,334
Look for allowance notice under Image File Wrapper tab.

October 2004 Laszlo Systems releases code for Laszlo Presentation Server to open-source.

November 8, 2004 WHATWG releases draft of Web Controls 1.0.

November 9, 2004 Recy43 Raging Bull VCSy posts truncated.

November 11, 2004 Ballmer throws chair during meeting with Mark Lucovsky on news he is leaving MSFT to join Google

November 18, 2004 Ballmer accuses Linux of violating >258 patents

November 30, 2004 VCSY SiteFlash Patent granted

December 1, 2004 VCSY delisted by SEC for reporting failure
Returned to listing by SEC December 6, 2005

December 13, 2004 SavaJe wins LG mobile OS gig
(SavaJe 26% owned by Vodafone, Orange and T-Mobile - ring ring)

December 15, 2004 Bill Gates joins board of Berkshire Hathaway

........

........ 

February 18, 2005 'AJAX' coined to describe web development centered around activity of Microsoft developed XMLhttpRequest

April 18, 2005 Adobe to acquire Macromedia

July 19, 2005 IBM and Lazlo Systems jointly propose Laszlo IDE for Eclipse

August 31, 2005 Patrick Tinley CEO of Ross Systems/CDC promoted to CEO of CDC Software

September 1, 2005 WHATWG releases draft of Web Apps 1.0

September 1, 2005 WHATWG releases draft of Web Forms 2.0

November 9, 2005 Vista was on a one sticker campaign 

December 5, 2005 Adobe completes acquisition of Macromedia

December 6, 2005 Patrick Tinley removed as CEO of CDC Software

December 6, 2005 VCSY returns from pinksheets (after delisting December 1, 2004)

December 6, 2005 CDC/Ross Systems CEO fired by CDC

December 13, 2005 IBM, SAP and Microsoft announce shut down of UDDI.
http://uddi.microsoft.com/about/FAQshutdown.htm

December 20, 2005 Microsoft is telling techs the Premium Standard is a minimum for Vista Aero.

http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/12/microsoft-releases-requirements-for.html 

These are absolute minimum requirements, and our testing here shows that to be productive in any way you will need to meet the Vista 'Premium' requirements:

-1 GHZ Processor
-1 GB of RAM
-A DirectX 9 Compatible Video card with a WDDM driver, 128 MB of ram, and 2.0 pixel shader
-40 GB of hard drive space

Even with the above specs, you will still feel Vista is sluggish. At least 2 GB of ram will make things much faster.
 

January 12, 2006 UDDI publication ceased.

January ??, 2006 Vista Windows Vista Premium Ready PCs Campaign becomes a two-sticker campaign ( or Windows Vista Capable ) to enrich Intel by dropping their qualification standards for Vista.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/capable.mspx

This is what you had to do to be a proper customer to Microsoft after the techno-bait-and-switch:http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/upgradeadvisor.mspx

Question: Why would Microsoft principals want to drop the qualification standards for anybody unless there was a compelling financial reason to do so? What benefit did it bring Microsoft? And if there is no common sense financial benefit to Microsoft?

Such a move as performed by Microsoft by dropping the performance qualifications to allow Intel to market a very large number of their Vista-incapable graphics chip sets as Vista Ready is so obviously fraught with risks charter, fiduciary and judicial principles, one has to conclude that, given no financial advantage to Microsoft, one can assume the act was involuntary on Microsoft's part.

In other words, somebody at Intel has a picture of somebody in Microsoft management and a dog we all would rather not have to see.

Well, in my world, the only thing that would get you to do what Microsoft did for Intel is if somebody had and promised to show the pictures of "our" last little strategy party to the world and me and the Poodle in the throes of kavorka-fueled puppy love was the hit of the party. Not good public relations for a corporate management culture toward instilling a general appearance of "soundness" IYKWIM.

(By the way, you may notice this will mark the point in the timeline when I shoved this post over the opinion line about as far as you can see. All I know is speculation and association but you're going to have to explain the trends if you're going to contend.)

Large earthquakes start as a "letting go" of wholeness on either side of a dividing line. People call them "faults". The same image can be drawn within a corporate population as a monolithic and homoegenous rock.

A tear across the surface of least resistance will cultivate between the populace who won't cross an ethical line and those to which ethical lines are imaginary boundary. When the impending tear progresses, you see or can sometimes project what path the good guys will take and which path the bad guys think will work.

Perhaps with time there will be those who don't intend to be found helping a lie perpetrate and there are many effective ways for discussing things in this present electronic age.

So the future is all a tither.

Alot has been said and there's more to look at. These are my opinions and impressions and if you don't understand the world of SCADA, don't sit and curse me. Learn something about distributed computing in some form before you start blathering about what one company has done and another hasn't.

Why this focus on UDDI? UDDI seems like an intimidating subject or concept, but it will give you, as a novice, a foundation for perceiving just how architecture determines how data and commands in a system will be handled and why some ideas are elegant, some are close-but-no-cigar and some are dogs-stepped-on-by-ponies.

UDDI also acts as a marker to correlate other events so a general sense of the direction a technology is headed (or not headed) can be mapped out before the common man finds out (if ever).

Think through and come up with a refutation of what I am saying.

So enjoy what you will but do your own thinking and compare what you know to all that you are considering. Make sure you're honest about what you see and how you're portraying the defining area and volume immediate to that fault.

Don't find yourself having to ignore the full range of a subject and limit your understanding about a particular uncomfortable subject.

Don't be slavish to a view you are  supposed to take based on an industry view, associations, avowed principles or issues hampering the considerations.

Think through. Work toward the most likely concept of future goal, regardless of limitations. Compare that emulation with the possiblilities suggested with the real picture and decide if the delta (the amount of change necessary to achieve the goal from present state) is possible conceptually (are you able to describe a scenario that starts at the present situation and can demonstrably follow a path that logically could happen to get to desired or above goal) or is simply a wishful thought (the resources or path to obtain enabling resources doesn't exist or has no chain of resources could make up the perceived gap from here to there).

Anywho, Have fun and we'll compare notes with each other on the other side of MIX08 or better.

........

March 21, 2006 Vista delayed

March 23, 2006 VCSY receives allowance for US 7,076,521
See USPTO PAIR Site at: http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
and use application number: 09/882,494
Look for allowance notice under Image File Wrapper tab.

March 24, 2006 Vista rewrite rumor surfaces (Scoble denies rumor)

March 24, 2006 Microsoft virtualization to be in Apple Leopard

........

May 08, 2006 Yahoo makes Panama ad center public 

May 17, 2006 Sun blesses JAVA phone with SavaJe
(SavaJe spinoff of Lucent 1999)

June 6, 2006 Raymond Niro takes on patent 6826744 case.

June 10, 2006 Robert Scoble abandons ship
(could not refute Vista rewrite rumor)

June 15, 2006 Ted Hase Leaves Microsoft

June 16, 2006 Sun's Tim Bray blog on SavaJe 

June 20, 2006 Martin Taylor leaves Microsoft with a *poof*

June 23, 2006 WinFS dead

June 26, 2006 Gates/Buffet bonding

June 29, 2006 Vic Gundotra resigns from Microsoft (currently behind Google+)

........

July 11, 2006 VCSY US 7,076,521 granted
(See allowance granted March 23 2006)

 

July 18, 2006 Yahoo Panama ad center delayed

July 19, 2006 Microsoft ad center delayed
(More like hit the pause button 7/14 - 7/19 - technical?)

July 25, 2006 HP announces acquiring Mercury Interactive

........

October 17, 2006 Yahoo Panama launched for internal use
(90 days after June 19, 2006)

October 17, 2006 SavaJe goes dark unexpectedly
(micro-kernel OS for JAVA - see May 17 2006) 

November 3, 2006 Ballmer invites Patent talks with Linux vendors 

........

January 4, 2007 Google's Mark Lucovsky (previously Microsoft November 2004) interviewed

January 28, 2007 James Gray disappeared
[expert in distributed transactional processes]

February 1, 2007 Yahoo Panama launched for public use

February 7, 2007 VCSY sends Microsoft cease and desist on  US 6,826,744
[patent granted November 30, 2004]

February 15, 2007 Michael Gartenberg joins Microsoft from Jupiter

February 19, 2007 Interview with Google's Mark Lucovsky published

February 20, 2007 Ballmer repeats threats against Linux on patents

March 7, 2007 Michael Gartenberg leaves Microsoft after 20 days to return to Jupiter

March 14, 2007 VCSY acquires exclusive rights for StatePointPlus in Government and Healthcare in the United States and Canada

March 2007 Microsoft requires Matthew Miszewski to sign employee agreement preventing him from disclosing confidential information "during his employment and at all times thereafter..."

March 23, 2007 Apple Leopard delay rumor surfaces
[reason: virtualization] [non-Apple sources deny]

April 5, 2007 Software AG buys Webmethods for $546 million.

April 12, 2007 Apple Leopard delay to October announced
[Apple admits]

April 12, 2007 Microsoft Viridian delay  to October announced
[virtualization]

April 13, 2007 Sun buys SavaJe IP
(which went dark in unexplained circumstances last year see Oct 17 2006)

April 16, 2007 Microsoft applies for Arbitrary Object Editing patent.

April 18, 2007 VCSY sued Microsoft for infringement on US 6,826,744

April 25, 2007 ProgrammersHeaven VCSY A Laughing Place (#1) shut down by webmaster

April 27, 2007 CEO AT&T (T) announced retirement

April 27, 2007 CEO Orange announced retirement

April 29, 2007 Microsoft announced Data Entity cut from Orcas

April 30, 2007 IBM retires much legacy Websphere Global

May 04, 2007 Microsoft + Yahoo formal talks fuzzle

May 10, 2007 Apple to release Leopard on original date June 

May 10, 2007 Microsoft cuts key elements from Viridian
http://vcsy.blogspot.com/2007/05/tracking-wounded.html

May 13, 2007 Ballmer accuses Linux of violating 258 patents

May 14, 2007 Estimated beginning of 60 day extension requested by Microsoft for negotiations re: VCSY v MSFT patent suit 

May 18, 2007 CDC/Ross Software CEO Yip reassigned to CEO Musser

May 24, 2007 Microsoft cancels Professional Developers Conference (PDC) scheduled for October

August 29, 2007 Interwoven confirms it no longer provides an XML-based content component management capability.

........

January 16, 2008 Oracle buys BEA Systems for $8.5 billion.

February 1, 2008 Microsoft makes unsolicited $45 billion bid for Yahoo.

February 11, 2008 Microsoft buys Danger.

July 23, 2008 Kevin Johnson, head of online division, announces leaving Microsoft.

July 25, 2008: Markman Hearing scheduled for this day in VCSY v MSFT for infringement of 6826744 did not occur because Microsoft settled with VCSY in a confidential settlement the day before the hearing.

July 25, 2008 - Microsoft announces largest stock buyback in company history.

September 30, 2008 Microsoft establishes first debt financing in company history for $6,000,000,000.

October 16, 2008 Microsoft Arbitrary Object Editing patent application published. See April 16, 2007 application date.

October 27, 2008 - Microsoft introduces Azure and "joins the cloud party".

........

January 12, 2009 - Interwoven notified of infringement of patent 6826744 by TeamSite 2006 product. See lawsuit circa November 15, 2010.

January 12, 2009 - Palm WebOS Synergy demonstrated.

January 22, 2009 - Interwoven agrees to be acquired by Autonomy.

March 5, 2009 - VCSY meets with Interwoven in San Jose, California. VCSY alleges Interwoven intentionally concealed its infringement of the 744 patent. See lawsuit circa November 15, 2010.

October 22, 2009 - Microsoft introduces Windows 7 to replace ill-fated Vista.

November 19, 2009 - Google releases long awaited Chrome OS web operating system.

........

January 18, 2010 Michael Miszewski appointed Senior VP Global Public Sector at Salesforce.

January 27, 2010 Microsoft blocks Miszewski move to Salesforce.

March 25, 2010 VCSY announces allowance of 7716629 continuance to 6826744.

April 14, 2010 - VCSY announces:
"In July 2008, we settled an infringement claim we had initiated in federal court against Microsoft. We are waiting for the issuance of the Continuation Patent for U.S. Patent No. 6,826,744 (which SiteFlash™ is based upon) before we engage with new licensees because we believe the Continuation Patent provides better protection for this intellectual property asset."

April 28, 2010 HP buys Palm

May 11, 2010 - VCSY granted patent  7716629 - a continuance of patent 6826744 "System and Method for Generating Web Sites in an Arbitrary Object Framework."

June 14, 2010 - VCSY institutes "poison pill" agreement.

June 14, 2010 - Microsoft enters into $1,250,000,000 indenture.

June 30, 2010 Microsoft kills Kin aka the Pink Danger.

August 12, 2010 - Interwoven notified of infringement of patent 6826744 by TeamSite 2006 product. Lawsuit alleges "Interwoven agains mislead Vertical into believing that it would attempt to resolve any patent infringement claim by Vertical by negotiating in good faith, but it obtained an extension of time under the pretext of studying the issues presented by Vertical to prepare a lawsuit against Vertical." See lawsuit circa November 15, 2010.

October 11, 2010 - Microsoft releases Windows Phone 7.

October 14, 2010 - Interwoven sues VCSY in an effort to have parts of 6826744 and 7716629 ruled invalid

October 24, 2010 - Ray Ozzie quits as "cloud computing guru" for Microsoft.

November 11, 2010 - Additional child application 12/777,885 to 7716629 made public by USPT.

November 12, 2010 - Silverlight gets its own developer event.

November 15, 2010 VCSY sues Interwoven, LG and Samsung for infringing against patents 6826744 and 7716629.

November 15, 2010 - Google Chrome OS web operating system delayed without explanation.

November 22, 2010 - Samsung focusing on Windows 7 instead of Android?

November 22, 2010 - Novell sells to Attachmate.

December 02, 2010 - Barry Diller resigns as IAC CEO. 

 

---------------

June 12, 2011 Entered for the historical record.

July 1, 2011 Microsoft/Apple group buys Nortel patents.

July 29, 2011 Google buys IBM patents.

August 15, 2011 Google buys Motorola Mobility.

August 18, 2011 HP offers to buy Autonomy.

 

Circa June 2012 VCSY responds to USPTO non-final rejection. 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 6:06 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, 14 June 2012 12:07 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (7) | Permalink
Saturday, 20 October 2007
The squishy remains of socks in the hamper...
Mood:  hug me
Now Playing: (What's the Word, Bird?) Family flies south for winter and takes tree for collateral.
Topic: Microsoft and VCSY

For the record (and just so things don't go... uhhhh... "missing", you know? Things do seem to have a habit of going ... uhhhh... "missing" on message boards.):

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/threadview?m=tm&bn=12004&tid=1305637&mid=1305637&tof=3&frt=1
coolness, innovation....from microsoft?

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/threadview?m=tm&bn=12004&tid=1305449&mid=1305449&tof=2&frt=1
Let's put it all out in front where the folks can see it, shall we?

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/threadview?m=tm&bn=12004&tid=1305662&mid=1305673&tof=1&frt=1
Re: And the pissing will go on...and on...


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 3:36 PM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 20 October 2007 3:37 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 19 October 2007
The purloined credibility...
Mood:  incredulous
Now Playing: (Box Canyon) Varmints ride into a rift and remain there.
Topic: Integroty
I have not altogether decided to crank the blog up again as I have always intended it to be a snapshot for reference as we look in hindsight.
However, an event occured recently that underscores suspicions we VCSY longs have had for quite some time extending back more than five years.
This event cries out for a resolution as it calls into question the validity of many many posts made on Raging Bull that appear to be the work of payed posters who have access to the Lycos system to manipulate posts.
As you can imagine, this causes the average poster to view the message board system and the Lycos/Raging Bull company in a very suspicious light given the magnitude of abusive posts defaming the VCSY company, its management, the stock and those who own the stock.
As per the disclaimer here, this blog is in no way connected with VCSY or any of its principals or operations or any associates. It is the sole work of myself posting here as rastamafoo.
  
A poster on the VCSY message board at Raging Bull managed to make a post, delete it as unsatisfactory (for some reason) then he posted again, replacing the original post #200328. The problem here is that an oridinary poster on Raging Bull is not supposed to have the ability to delete posts.
Here is the evidence copied from the original posts:
By: rheemer1
17 Oct 2007, 05:27 PM EDT
Msg. 200328 of 200328
(This msg. is a reply to 200319 by divrjes.)

Jump to msg. #  
divrjes, You are so full of it.... ther is nothing HAPPEN!!

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Hold; LT Rating- Hold)
This is the post that took the place of 200328
By: rheemer1
17 Oct 2007, 05:30 PM EDT
Msg. 200328 of 200328
(This msg. is a reply to 200326 by stillwtr19.)

Jump to msg. #  
Still, I'll answer your question when you and the pumper sqwad answer mine?
It would help to know the question first!

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Buy; LT Rating- Buy)
I would think the easy thing for the poster to do at the time would be to claim it as a "technical glitch" as was the usual "explanation" these suspected connected posters would make. But, apparently caught off-guard, "rheemer1" made a fantastic claim that the posts were somehow "faked".
That seems to be his story and he's sticking to it, although an associate of his claims it to be a simple case of the first post being "TOSsed" meaning a result of a reported violation of the Terms Of Service (TOS) for the board.
Notice the posts are three minutes apart. A TOS violation report must first be made by a reader and the RB Moderator must read that report and respond by reviewing the reported post and deciding whether to take action or not. Three minutes is a very short period of time indeed. Plus, if you will read the first post, you will notice there is nothing in the post to violate the TOS. This means the Raging Bull Moderator for the VCSY board would have no actionable reason to TOSs the post.
The associate would have a reasonable point except for the time involved and the fact that the post does not constitute a TOS violation. Take that in light of the fact rheemer1 claims the post is "faked" by someone who wants to embarass him and the episode takes on a three stooges act.
HOWEVER, this is one of a large number of examples of deleted posts which, by studying copies of the posts made before they were deleted, indicate certain posters are able to make outlandish comments about VCSY with indicated impunity, then remove the posts when complaints arise.
In some situations many selected posts of particular poster names are deleted.
This facility would serve a planted poster with an agenda to damage conversation about the company well. We VCSY longs apparently now have direct evidence this sort of thing can be done.
That raises large concerns about the trustworthiness of a message forum like Raging Bull and the VCSY board on Raging Bull specifically.
I will attempt to keep the reader updated on the progress of this situation as several VCSY longs have forewarded the above examples of the post and their various complaints to the Raging Bull parent company and VCSY principals.
I think the following post by a VCSY long states the issue well for the general long attitude:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=200572
 
end of message (eom)
PS - I apologize for the distorted dimensions of the posts as pasted. This blog site interprets the HTML as copied from Raging Bull pages in an odd way, but, I chose not to modify the post to demonstrate to the user this is a true cut and paste from Raging Bull.
Of course, rheemer1 claims the first item was a total fabrications and it is up to the reader to believe as they may choose. Discovery into the Raging Bull archival system will indicate what actually happened.

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 8:11 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 19 October 2007 8:17 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 25 July 2007
The End Is Near
Mood:  hug me
Now Playing: 'This is a test - if this were not a test you would be SOL'
Topic: Calamity

If Microsoft is counting on exhibit_for_msft_response.pdf to prove "prior art", Microsoft shareholders should start getting shelac and brushes to use to decoupage their Microsoft shares once they lose the VCSY patent lawsuit.

UDATE

And IF I am allowed by the poorly acting site software I will endeavour to prove my contentions.

As it is, just logging in to this blog is a chore as the software is hanging up and not allowing free movement.

UPDATE

Apparently this blog site is no longer on-line. I shall retire to Laughing Place #3 and tell the story there that I have been denied the opportunity to tell here.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 4:14 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 25 July 2007 6:10 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink
Thursday, 19 July 2007
Mommy, that man is eating my teddy bear.
Mood:  hug me
Now Playing: Can't See the Intent for the Intent Poles - Consentual Camping Training Video (adult language)
Topic: Microsoft and VCSY

Masts and Sails! Either this is a flagship or a pirate ship. harrr. Best pump up me parrot and screw in the old powdered peg leg. Looks like more socializing with the hedge hogs.

Astoria and the Semantic Web

posted Mon 16 Jul 07

Kevin Hoffman's Blog

I have said it before and I'll say it again, Microsoft's Pablo Castro is one of the few people putting stuff out there from Microsoft that really seem to "get it". He knows how people want their data (well, he knows how I want my data, and that's really all that counts, right?) and he seems to be on the same page as everyone else that I have spoken to as far as the whole REST thing. People want their data to be located at discrete, uniquely identifiable URIs. End of story.

In case you have been living under a rock, or you really don't care about Microsoft's "data in the cloud" strategies, Pablo Castro is the technical lead responsible for such gems as the ADO.NET Entity Framework and Astoria. Astoria is a project that wraps up an Entity Data Model in a WCF service with a uniform URI query format that allows for RESTful access to relational data via XML, RDF, or JSON.

The notion of the semantic web isn't really all that new, but it has been gaining a lot of momentum lately. The short story is that right now everyone is using the Web to publish and view human-readable content. What we look at on a daily basis is graphical, textual, and has animations, flash, whatever. The bottom line is that the content is human-readable. The semantic web pushes forward the notion that in addition to using the web for human-readable content, it should be used for data as well. The means by which the data on the semantic web is accessed is through raw HTTP, through a standard representational format like XML or RDF. It's a fantastic theory but I think it's too eutopian at the moment. I don't think that anytime in the near future the web is going to be flooded with this huge sprawling green field of RESTful services exposing POX/RDF data for the entire world to consume. Ths is where technology and business diverge. Technologically speaking, the eutopian vision of the truly semantic web is quite possible, and many people are working toward that goal right now. If you look at it from a business perspective, however, the outlook is a little darker. Bottom line is that people aren't going to embrace the semantic web until they can make money off of it.

Tools like Astoria are a fantastic tool by which we can expose data in a way that jives with the vision of the semantic web. The problem is that there are business concerns to exposing data on the web, not the least of which is of course -how do you charge people for that data? How do you make money off of exposing that data? The great thing about a semantic web and standardized data location and access methods is of course mashups. If anybody knows how to get at your data, and they know that your data is referenced in a way that is similar to the way in which Bob is exposing his data, etc - then everyone can consume everyone's data and the entire world enters a euphoric bliss of data consumption.

So what I see really happening is that corporations are going to take baby steps. Perhaps they will adopt "semantic web" style philosophies internally... hopefully they will even be using Astoria to expose relational models and helper methods on top of those relational models to allow applications within a corporation to consume data. In my ideal world, this is the way much of an organization's data is exposed internally. The clash between technological philosophy and real-world business practice occurs when you try and deal with how to authenticate access to your data, how you charge for your data, and how you license your data, etc.

The great thing about tools like Astoria for exposing the data and tools like Silverlight for rendering exposed data is that regardless of what the business people decide the future of the semantic web is going to be - you'll be ready. In that regard, as long as people like Pablo Castro are still allowed to make some decisions within Microsoft, we will still see a steady stream of good things coming - at least from the data team, anyway.

 

UPDATE

 testing one two three

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 12:03 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 25 July 2007 1:35 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
So far what's going on.
Mood:  lazy
Now Playing: Wiki Waky Taffy - Jungle book creators put wrong jacket on romance novel.
Topic: Calamity

Uhhh... This is, like, really weird, ok? We was all just having a hoot on Raging Bull and choochoo's all like 'Bro, Vertical Computers switch CEO's' and we're all 'No way.' and he's all 'Way bro.' and he has this URL and what it says on the piece below. Check it out and see if you can figure out what this means.

Vertical Computer Systems Inc. Announces Appointment Of ChairmanWed Jul 18 17:30:00 EDT 2007
Reuters
Vertical Computer Systems Inc. announced that Timothy Philip Read joins the Board of the Company as Executive Chairman. The Company also announced that Roy Spencer steps down as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and becomes a Non Executive Director of the Company.
Stop.

Only one problem. That's not the CEO of VCSY. Richard Wade is the CEO. 

Now, that may not look like much to you, but to some it looks like VCSY has an announcement in the pipeline and some copy clerk and editor made a big time booboo.

We're waiting to see what the explanation will be.

It might mean we're rich but then again it might mean we're, like, out of chicken and pepsi.

Like, wow, man.

This update brought to you by The Hooka House the original hemp boutique south side of San Mateo and tell them Jerry sent ya.

UPDATE

The Reuters URL: http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/keyDevelopments.asp?symbol=VCSY.OB&WTmodLOC=C3-News-8


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:30 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 19 July 2007 12:31 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Series 1 - post 1
Mood:  hug me
Now Playing: The Pie Eyed Piper - Townsfolk who loved to dance refuse to pay the band
Topic: Calamity

I decided to post a promised rackdown on a concept I've been waiting to show in the press. Now that it has (see this:  http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/07/web_20_needs_ad.html  - again, thanks to POSCASH for understanding what this article is saying. POS is a fine example of our PHeaven BootUpTheButt Camp techno-novices who fundamentally leap-frog the existing technological world with a buzzword grasp that turns him into an information surgeon. [Tissue sample, lunch meat, if you slice the stuff thin and can look at it in an educated way, you end up with a happy customer instead a piece of dead meat]) I think a bit of education per patent examination will enlighten the reader's way a bit more.

I've dispensed with the comic book font for these Series posts (except for a friendly howdy or a sardonic "what the c:!$$$ are you people doing?") for clarity and reading ease and look forward to plotting out what VCSY technology means to the web world.

Thanks for your kind attention.

Series 1 - post 1. How to step over a stream.

Rule 0. Words that are in () are for your edification. (Don't go talking like that in a technological crowd because they will think you're a freak. It hurts feelings. Like asking for a boiled weinie in a Sushi restaurant.)

Rule 1. When it says ('reference:'), get your crackedass to a search engine and search the words after that reference.

Rule 2. Words that are in Rule 1 format but are not reference you can read at leisure. It will be better to read Rule 1 subjects first so you can have a background sufficient for appreciating Rule 2.

Rule 3. Words in "" are 'sardonic'.

(Nobody expects you to understand any of what you read, but we expect you to read it. It's the least you can do for the work we've put out for no pay. It will enrich your understanding of the industry [as it can be best read from a 15,000 foot level while watching the activity of everybody involved down there at 3000.] Read wikipedia if you can find one on the word.

What you will have after that is a 'buzzword' that people use as a shorthand to explain a very large concept in a word or phrase. Other's will understand, to some degree, the background information need to fully describe that buzzword subject, application and discipline in that order.

Some understand a substantial amount.

Some are like you.

It doesn't matter AS LONG AS YOU KNOW HOW THE BUZZWORD SUBJECT WORKS. If you don't STFU and listen. You will learn over time and then you can be a useful part of the conversation. Thank you for your kind attention. Now, on with the show and tell.)

Begin A:
Short story (from here to Mom's house):
One thing you need to remember and watch in the days, weeks, months and years ahead is this: AJAX = 7,076,521

What does that mean? It means, when AJAX evolves into an ultimately useful item, it will have succeeded in duplicating the claims of patent 7,076,521

-----------
Long story (from zero to first stage cutoff):
So, what does that mean? It means the work MSFT did in XMLhttp to build a client on the browser ultimately evolved into something that would listen for a call from the server while it sat on the browser acting as a client.

The button or image or hyperlink you pressed could send a signal to the server saying, hey, whatever display object this item is connected so, send that the information related to this thing (button, etc).

The server would then do whatever work it took to find that information (data processed) and would then send JUST THAT data (information transported) to the item on the page (usually a text box - any changing text on a web page is most likely in a text box) which would usually display the information in context with the rest of the page (since the textbox is supposed to be a part of the formatted content on the page).

So those are the steps and here is what that accomplished:

In traditional webpage programming, without such a client you have to send the requested information embedded in an entire copy of the web page. That is the cause of the latency (that delay between the time you pushed the 'send' button and the number in the box you entered actually showed up as a new number - it's the time it takes for the button to send the request and the time the browser takes to process the source code into a webpage for display - even if the round trip between the client and the process could be refined to 'zero', the time it takes for the browser to read the source code and interpret that code into the webpage display you see, including the new information you pressed the button for.) that drives you mad and makes it impossible for the internet to act as a computer.

So, Microsoft and others came up with something called XMLrequest which allowed the guy or gal (you) to push the button (which sends a request for data to be displayed like the previous example button did, but, this time with only the text that the button asked for - not the entire webpage).

So the server sends back this one piece of data and it goes directly to the item on the page (text box, image anchor, Flash(tm of Adobe) - anything on the web page you could tag as an item for showing data in context as information).

The web page sits there and does nothing because it never received any source code to execute (the web browser is a little software computer built on top of a hardware computer like your desktop or cell phone etc. - where the hardware is 'real' the software computer is 'virtual' [exists only as data] and thus is called a 'virtual machine' or VM).

But the little textbox next to the button you pushed just changed.

It will change as fast as it takes for the round trip from the client agent (the XMLrequest) to the server and back. Thus, the interaction has less latency (see there, now you're talking like a communications guru) and a more realtime 'look and feel'. Plus, this frees up the connection between your webpage and server by not having to send the webpage chunks again.

So, something like XMLhttp (which later morphed into 'XMLhttpRequest') by Microsoft is good to have as you can see.

It updates the information on a webpage with less latency (faster).

Good all around and nice to have. Essential to web application building.

Now, I want you to look at the eventual 'obvious' destination such an effort will take you. Like I said, you don't have to understand it, as long as you read it. The brain has a marvelous capability of allowing information to seep past the shallow associations we have in our brain's model of the day. In a few days it gets to becoming more clear and you have no idea where that information came from.

One of the Biblical guys said no man may receive (get to know) anything except it be from God ("the 'force'" imprints us with a pattern of logic and we think the thoughts) thus invention is a divine thing and most likely protected by the divinity doing the invention (programming).

(reference: DHTML, XML, XMLrequestHttp)

Glossary:
agent (a consumer of services that does other things)


United States Patent  7,076,521
Davison  July 11, 2006 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Web-based collaborative data collection system


Abstract
The present invention is directed to a system for gathering data from a web-based server, transmitting the data to a web-based client, and storing the data on the web-based client. The web-based server translates data from a data supplier's proprietary data model into a data consumer's proprietary data model using a data mapping function. The web-based server also converts data from a structured data format to a markup language format. The web-based client periodically polls one or more data servers for data. The web-based client receives data in a markup language format and translates it into a structured data format, then stores it in a database. The web-based client and the web-based server can collaborate with each other to streamline the data conversion and translation process.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventors:  Davison; Jeff (Rockledge, FL) 
Assignee: Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. (Los Angeles, CA)
 
Appl. No.:  09/882,494
Filed:  June 15, 2001


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 1:12 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 1:15 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 17 July 2007
Pooky Pie on Steroids
Mood:  incredulous
Now Playing: Steroid Steel - Body builder notices soft spot at top of head is spreading
Topic: Integroty

I said it before and I'll say it again.

 

I would also think if Microsoft were so confident about their ability to fight this 744 patent fight, they would have given their response more visibility.

You know, like, encourage the troops with a demonstration of fighting spirit so the partners can tell they really should navigate toward the web services sea instead of setting the Captain adrift for stringing them along for so long.

If you've done any readign on the patents you're likely to be saying "Hell, that covers every aspect of computer construction on the web." and you would be right, sir or madam as the case may be.

BUT. There's one problem with your kneejerk response of 'too broad' or 'too obvious' and that's Microsoft's Friday evening filing of a response to VCSY's lawsuit that covers the web ecology patent 744. they disagree with your assertion by default. They aren't challenging the content or validity of the technology so the 'bull$#!@' tag that was thrown over VCSY stuff on this board last year is in the dumpster where it belonged all along.

You sorely misinformed those who read your thoughts.

It's going to cost all these trusting loyal partners some heartbreak and broken promises moments and years. I hope they can forgive that sort of betrayal. Delay delay delay their entry into the web arena... why, because Microsoft was afraid to have to face the 744 issue in public. So they waited because that's better than stepping out there and having to face it early?

Pretty sad legacy here for what Bill Gates' is leaving Microsoft shareholders holding. A wizard who can't float his own hot air balloons and a cowardly lion who can't face his own partners? Is Buffet the one without the heart? Is Gates the one without the brain?

So, like it or not, 744 covers web applications of all kinds and that covers web-operating systems.

And if they don't work out that imbroglio out they can't get to 521 which covers web-facing data trans-processes.

So. Hmmm. VCSy price is rock steady like it's been coming up to this day. Everybody's holding tight waiting for an announcement.

Microsoft... what's the price been doing with Microsoft's history of stock price? Holding flat for how many years? The market saying 'Show us something and we'll get excited.' MSFT saying 'Yeah, but you're really going to love what we put out when we finally produce something. hee hee' ... then telling pretty-partner to turn around and take it like a chump and not even an apology. Stupid partners. Didn't you know all this web services thing wasn't a fad. Just like you followed Bill Gates when he told you the internet was a fad. Are you all just legless sheep unable to move if you had a thought come across your mind?

Sounds like true love.

And Microsoft, bragging about their 'rights' would love to show you their long history of innovation but it's buried up to the hilt in partner pooh. But, HEY, We're all set to prove this bogus patent is bogus, like, if we... have to. We'll pull it out and reveal it for sure! Just you wait!

Yeah. That inspires safe and secure confidence like a prophylactic on a wedgie machine.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 8:09 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
One foot on the platform, the other on the plane.
Mood:  celebratory
Now Playing: Muckmuck's Vacation - Caveman rediscovers roots in under-developed countries.
Topic: Microsoft and VCSY

And this is so important I thought I should post it in two places at once.

Will Microsoft be reverse engineering 521?

Is this a test rocket or a cannonball?

It's my opinion this is not doable without stepping on 521 claims. I am open to debate anyone who says they think Microsoft is doing it differently.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=582
July 17th, 2007
Microsoft offering Office 2007 for rent on a monthly basis
Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 12:11 pm

Looks like Microsoft’s intial pilots of pay-as-you-go pricing for Office were successful.

Microsoft has expanded its Office rental trial in South Africa to include Office 2007. Microsoft will make Office 2007 available for 199 rand ($28.54) for a three-month subscription, according to a Reuters report. First-time users willg et an extra three months for free, Reuters said. (Thanks to Bink.nu for the link to the Reuters story.)

Microsoft has been testing pay-as-you-go schemes for Office 2003 in several developing countries, including South Africa, company officials said earlier this year. At that time, Microsoft officials said the Office rental trials were also in full-swing in Mexico and Romania. Back in January, Microsoft was planning to decide “in the next couple of months” whether to extend the program to include Office 2007.

I’ve asked Microsoft whether it plans to extend this program and offer Office 2007 on a subscription basis in other countries. Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, would you be interested in renting Office — or any other Microsoft app — on a monthly basis? Why or why not?


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 4:14 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
The Neverending Story
Mood:  happy
Now Playing: Etched in Stone - Moses drops hammer on mountainview
Topic: Microsoft and VCSY

Some folks think I have no life. Of course I do. This is it. What would I do if I didn't have this hobby? Maybe finish my model airplane.

157635

Oh Microsoft virtualization is good enough to bea

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:46 PM EDT

157634

Folks are free to comment anywhere. I am thus NOT

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:42 PM EDT

157633

Dear RB Moderator - I apologize for the number of

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:40 PM EDT

157632

Ouch.

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:37 PM EDT

157631

"In some ways, though, the online world is l

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:36 PM EDT

157630

I'm laying in a record for you to explain to the

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:32 PM EDT

157629

"...a performance nonetheless that put the o

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:30 PM EDT

157628

yoyo, You're pumpin' a dry well.

nicheslapper  

17 Jul 2007 3:27 PM EDT

157627

Ballmer "...lectured with little humor and m

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:24 PM EDT

157626

Before we launch off into any technical explanati

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:23 PM EDT

157625

And here's a list of dates and events to give the

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:09 PM EDT

157624

correction 721= 521 aka Patent 7,076,521

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 3:00 PM EDT

157623

Problem? Yes. MSFT does not have free access to 7

yo-eleven  

17 Jul 2007 2:57 PM EDT

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 3:52 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 17 July 2007 4:02 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older