Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« May 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Apple Fritters
Calamity
Chinadotcom and VCSY
DD to da RR
Endorsements
Facebook
GLOSSARY
Gurgle
HP and VCSY
Integroty
Microsoft and VCSY
Nobody Can Be That Stupid
Notable Opinions
Off the Wall Speculation
Panama
Pervasive Computing
Reference
SaaS
SOA
The DISCLAIMER
The Sneaky Runarounds
TIMELINE
VCSY
VCSY / Baseline
VCSY / Bashed
VCSY / Infotech
VCSY / MLE (Emily)
VCSY / NOW Solutions
VCSY - A Laughing Place #2
Monday, 21 May 2007
Depending on the size of the hole, we'll have a pool, a pond or a lake.
Mood:  energetic
Now Playing: 'Plummeting Pullet' Chicken ranch gets wiped out by asteroid strike. (Physics/Cooking)
Topic: Integroty

Nuff said. I wonder what remedy they've chosen. Starve the herd? 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117970745887009068.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo
By Justin Lahart

The tech company that really seems to be enjoying Microsoft's new operating system is Apple.

The Cupertino, Calif., computer maker has used Microsoft's Vista, introduced in November for businesses and January for consumers, as an opportunity to make hay over the self-proclaimed superiority of the operating system in its own Macs. Microsoft doesn't agree with that message, noting it has shipped 40 million copies of Vista for consumers. Still, Apple has the hotter hand. Mac sales were up 35% in the first quarter versus a year earlier. PC sales were up by 9%, according to research firm Gartner...

More at URL


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 5:44 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 May 2007 5:45 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
When 'Yes, we don't do that' means leave and don't look back.
Mood:  don't ask
Now Playing: 'Disgusting Dainties' Nothing left to chance or imagination on laundry day. (Criminal)
Topic: Integroty

I Call BULL$#!@

This makes me want to just puke. Duplicitous, half-baked, know-nothings and sycophants trying to "frame the discussion" when everybody else finished that topic months and years ago.

Absolutely nauseating. 

 

Interoperability an enterprise reality, claims Microsoft

http://www.itpro.co.uk/news/113655/interoperability-an-enterprise-reality-claims-microsoft.html
Posted by Nicole Kobie in Seattle at 1:43PM, Monday 21st May 2007
Convergence, heterogeneous systems and security hurdles mean even competing IT firms must work together to keep their programs working.

IT companies must work together to develop interoperable systems in the face of convergence and security burdens, according to innovation leaders at Microsoft.

Speaking at a press conference at the company's US campus in Redmond, representatives said that enterprise needs IT firms to collaborate to ensure interoperability (Why? Because interoperability isn't something Microsoft does with the outside world even though they DID tell you their file systems were all "interoperable". Don't you remember that?) trends convergence, heterogeneous IT systems, virtualisation, public sector projects and security needs have all made interoperability and collaboration necessary to survive ("...now. It wasn't quite like this last year when we had control.").

"It wasn't that long ago that 'interoperability' and 'heterogeneous' were words you'd never hear from someone at Microsoft (excuse me ladies and gentlemen but how long have I, your host with the most, been telling you that...? Congratulations. Microsoft has finally seen fit to tell you numbskulls the dirty truth.)," said group product manager Margaret Dawson. "It's the reality for enterprise now."

("Reality"? No $#!@? Is that right? Interoperability is a "reality" that they haven't been working on at Microsoft? Haven't been considering the impact in IT providers partnered with Microsoft? What happened to the vaunted 'interoperability is in the file' strategy? Didn't work, did it? What a transparent bunch of hoots MSFT are now. Laugh out loud foolish and your clients will have to pick up the tab to enable you to do it, is that right? Let's all share the burden. LOL Beans and weinies in a bubbling pot.)

The need for interoperability has pushed (THERE's the magic words. Nobody pushed them to do anything about it before. "Why do you make me screw up like this? It's not fair... waaahhhh.") Microsoft to partner with companies they also compete with - something Dawson termed "co-opatition". (Some of us call it copulation but it all depends on who's definition you use.)

Recently, the software giant announced it was working with competitor OpenOffice, to develop tools to increase interoperability between the two document formats. (Hmmm. Finally getting the message I see.)

The increasing convergence of software, hardware and telecommunication systems means applications, devices and processes must be compatible. "You can't have that [convergence] unless different companies work together (or Microsoft agrees to work with other companies)," said Tom Robertson, the general manager for standards at Microsoft.

In addition, enterprises are shifting to heterogeneous IT systems, where they pick and mix solutions from a variety of vendors (arbitrary) to find the right price or tool for their own specific needs. In turn, vendors need to ensure their products work with their partners and competitors alike, or risk being frozen out of enterprise contracts.

(Poor BABIES! You mean all you software developers didn't know the sandbags MSFT was putting up around the moat were not to keep folks out but to keep you IN? Say it ain't so!) 

Virtualisation, another top IT trend, will also bring challenges (as soon as we can catch up). As programs from different vendors are being used on the same hardware, companies must ensure interoperability, Robertson said.

Governments and the public sector bring another twist (you mean like a Texas Titty-Twister?) to interoperability, as IT systems increasingly feature in policy. For example, Robertson said that as healthcare records in Europe are digitised, they must be accessible in any country, regardless of the operation system or application being used. IT Solutions will need to be able to translate and read data from competing systems (or employ a system that provides for virtualization and arbitration).

Speaking about improvements to security in Microsoft products, principle security program manager Michael Howard said that tightening controls and defences in operating systems will have repercussions for externally developed applications.

"All these defences we have in place are going to affect other applications, so we need to work together," Howard said.

Kum buy ya my Lord Kum buy ya. Somebody's getting their butt kicked, Lord. Kum buy ya...

If you nitwits could come up with a way of virtualizing all your applications and arbitrating the differences between them... and that's with ALL... not just Microsoft applications, you might actually gain some respect from your industry.

As it is, your management has lead you to the point where you will have to work three times as hard as anybody else to come up with something half as useful.

Hoooey. That's the most polite term I can come up with for this bunch of past time nose rubbers. And for those of you who don't read big words very often like "interoperablility" why don't you try this one for starters:

duplicitous adj. Given to or marked by deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech.

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 4:30 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 23 May 2007 2:30 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
When 'I'll be done before you know it." really means something
Mood:  bright
Now Playing: 'Perking Punchy' Cafeinated office workers finish careers ahead of schedule. (Office Party)
Topic: Pervasive Computing

This will be a frontal assault on what makes IT happen so IT can be done for less with fewer.

IBM's Power6 spotted bashing Oracle at 4.7GHz

Sweaty database

Published Sunday 20th May 2007 04:33 GMT
Research library - All papers free to download.

The first public indication of IBM's Power6 muscle has arrived courtesy of Oracle.

The Register has spotted four 4.7GHz - yep, you read that right - Power6 chips cranking on Oracle 11i. The speedy chips confirm IBM's boasting that Power6 would arrive near 5GHz. They also show that IBM's customers have a lot to look forward to in terms of raw performance.

With 4.7GHz chips (4MB of L2 and 32MB of L3 cache), an IBM p570 server showed an average response time of .625 seconds when handling requests from 2,100 users. That compares to a p570 with 2.2GHz Power5+ chips that had a response time of .983 seconds for 2,000 users.

You can catch all the benchmarks here until Oracle notices this story (Update: Oracle has removed the results). We've also taken the liberty of copying a PDF report on the results for you here.

The benchmarks arrive just ahead of IBM's Power6 server launch. The rumor mill says IBM will unveil its Power6 gear, starting with midrange systems such as the p570, on Tuesday.

Thus far, IBM has been reluctant to discuss the Power6-based systems' performance. But, with chips running at 4.7GHz, IBM should clean up on a wide variety of benchmarks even if customers don't recompile their software as is needed for absolute best results with Power6.

A number of skeptics have told us that IBM will struggle in the near-term to produce 4GHz+ chips in volume. IBM, however, has been telling customers that it will have plenty of speedy chips to go around. (It looks like IBM will offer systems with 3.5GHz, 4.2GHz and 4.7GHz versions of Power6 from what we hear.)

IBM had once planned to ship Power6-based servers in 2006. It could use some new gear to go up against Sun and HP's high-end gear, which have been selling well in recent months. ®

Anyone want to bet the hardware industry feels threatened by IBM's green Power strategy?

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 3:02 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 May 2007 3:14 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Last thing I remember I looked up and said "Hey, isn't that our tour bus?"
Mood:  accident prone
Now Playing: 'Snowball' Things get out of control quick as accumulated trash rolls through office complex.
Topic: Gurgle

Here comes the avalanche. Are all you Microsofties in your snowfort? Did you remember to bring your lumps of coal, a carrot and a top hat so we can recognize you after the slide? You boys and girls had better be getting some new goo or your future will be pasty poo.

A blog regarding risks, problems, drawbacks, and alternatives.

The Enterprise System Spectator

http://fscavo.blogspot.com/2007/05/google-and-saleforcecom-to-team-against.html
Monday, May 21, 2007
by Frank Scavo, 5/21/2007 10:16:00 AM

Google and Saleforce.com to team against Microsoft?

(uhhh ya think?)

The Wall Street Journal this morning is reporting that talks are underway between Google and Salesforce.com concerning a partnership. The goal is to combine Google's email, instant messaging, and other online services with Salesforce.com's applications, effectively providing an alternative to Microsoft's desktop and business applications.
By teaming up, Google and Salesforce.com could be better equipped to contend with Microsoft, a mutual rival. Google has long competed with Microsoft in areas such as search and email. More recently, Google began offering online word-processing, spreadsheet and calendar services for consumers and businesses -- Web-based applications known as Google Apps -- that offer an alternative to Microsoft's productivity software.

Salesforce.com also competes with Microsoft's customer-relationship management software. Microsoft plans to offer a Web-based version of that software that could compete more directly with Salesforce.com.
I say, why stop there? Google should acquire Salesforce.com outright. That would put Google's best-in-class scalable infrastructure underneath Salesforce.com's best-in-class software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform. It would catapult Salesforce.com's position as a provider of enterprise applications to small and mid-size businesses, leapfrogging Microsoft's nascent attempts in this area.

A Google buyout of Salesforce.com? I think it's a real possibility.

Related posts
Salesforce.com unbundling its platform from its apps
Computer Economics: The Business Case for Software as a Service
by Frank Scavo, 5/21/2007 10:16:00 AM

 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 2:46 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 May 2007 3:30 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
I tried to bring up the financial system. Oh, yeah, we turned that one off.
Mood:  caffeinated
Now Playing: 'Saving Money' High tech engineers come up with money saving idea; Don't use anything.
Topic: Pervasive Computing

"...experts plead...". Yeah. Now, there's a solution just crying out for implementation. Pay high priced IT people to sit there at the end of each day and turn servers off. "Hey, aren't we going to need that server?" "I dunno. It's on the turn-off-every-day list."

Great planning.

Now I think you might understand why IBM's Power series with empath will be so important for server farms...  

Turn off servers to go green, experts plead

http://www.itpro.co.uk/news/113698/turn-off-servers-to-go-green-experts-plead.html
Posted by Rene Millman at 6:21PM, Monday 21st May 2007

Expert urges companies to adopt Japanese practices and turn servers off at night.


European companies need to follow their Japanese counterparts in tackling datacentre space, power, and heat issues by switching servers off every evening, according to an expert.

Bernhard Brandwitte, director of enterprise servers product marketing at Fujitsu Siemens Computers said that turning off servers could save the expense of running systems.

"It may seem radical because organisations are told never to touch a running system. However, organisations can use combined storage devices to switch off the processing core and save money," he said.

Brandwitte admitted that this would only be suitable for non-mission-critical applications but companies could still save money by using virtualisation to consolidate physical servers. He said in doing so an organisation's could reduce its carbon footprint.

"Management software also enables administrators to power systems up or down remotely and transfer the processing load to poorly utilised servers," said Brandwitte.

"However, we must not just rely on this development in the data centre though. We must also learn from our Japanese counterparts and share best practice."

Others said that while projects such as the Energy Efficiency Building Retrofit Program aimed to replace legacy heating, cooling and lighting systems with more efficient systems, companies should not overlook IT systems and equipment.

"Research shows that IT is responsible for up to 40 per cent of a typical large UK enterprise's carbon footprint," said David Elwen, director at IT consultancy DMW. "With near exponential growth in IT hardware sales predicted, this footprint will only increase."

He said there were many simple measures that can be taken to reduce the corporate IT carbon footprint.

"Attacking the most power-hungry applications such as IT servers is where the most difference will be made," he said. "Contrary to popular belief, Google found that by turning up the temperature on their IT servers not only reduced the failure rate, but saved energy usage by turning off their cooling equipment."

Elwen said this was the sort of green policy which companies "should be considering first and foremost."

Hey, how about looking for some innovation first? 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 2:40 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 May 2007 2:44 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Yep. I lied. So sue me. THIS is a post.
Mood:  caffeinated
Now Playing: 'Amorised Depreciation' Mores and civility go out the window with the beginning of a new school year. (Animal House/Pets)
Topic: Calamity

I see indications, given new blood coming in from Microsoft's web-oriented past (circa 1999 for Web-applications experience and circa 2004 for distributed transactional platform experience) and restructuring their server taskforces to line up under the Office side of the room. I suspect they have something that will allow them to proceed immediately to integrating their office application stack(s) like they should have been doing back in 2004 and 1999.

What the HELL have they been doing over there spending all that R&D to bring these guys and do what? Where's Oz? Where's the magic clipboard? 

Appears to me a once timid toward web-stuff Microsoft has been morphed in some fashion into a confident Microsoft willing to put reputation and honor on the line as evidenced calling back prior employees to save the precious pork belly, as it were, of Mom.

I would say the signs say Microsoft is beginning to say it's moving toward the only thing that would make sense for them to do in this day and time of SaaS maturation.

If they don't get their office products into an integrated engine for productivity and make such productivity package available over the web, the webified versions of office products will have sufficient appeal and capability and integration to wash out any more purchases of that venerable and historic era in business software: the office suite.

Now it will be trailers and coffeeshops - anywhere to where you can run a Verizon single fiber. Multi-100GigaBitsPerSecond for the little guy and the bigger guys get 400GigaBitsPerSecond on a single fiber, mon frer'. Chevrolet coupe'. Instantaneous real time automation for office and vertical industry workflow and activity.

Add convergence to that with image and soung recognition and processing, and we're looking at an explosion in business doability where 100k workers skilled in a boring yob can apply themselves to those users who can't quite get the hang at building and using web applications... this will be the beginning of the end of "programmers" as we know it.

Actually the end began back in February 2001 when VCSY introduced an almost unseen product a couple weeks before Microsoft released Hailstorm. That journey has brought us to this week when Microsoft will address the Open Source audience and will either make sounds like a pack animal welcoming social intercourse and butt smelling for transparency... as opposed to a wounded bovine leaking blood, guts and brains from a run through the rocks by a pack of angry customers. They can be worse that hyenae.

But, now, the wolves smell the blood and they're closing in... while Gates is in his cloister counting the millions he sold last month for whatever philantrobic endeavour he might alight upon. Good riddance to bad attitude. 

Repurposing an entire industry is what IBM is in the process of. Big dealing with humanity's future they are. Wise counsel of large minds in maelstrom it is. Watch for the weasels as they are the rats in the cornbins of history.

Good luck world. Brother Rasta Mafoozle, Pastor of the Rasta Moofo Wanga Pangy Nook Nook Pasteurization Church of the Almighty Pissed & Bar and Grill wishes you 'Good luck with all that.'. We got Jax and Blue Ribbon and some Al Green on the Juke box and a cabin cruiser in the brine and monkey man making fire is one thing. Making a steam engine is entirely a different time. God knows who made the fire so he ain't impressed.

Sit back, relax, listen to the sax in the wax and I'll be right back after a few words of wisdom along the graveled way... 

click

... but the lawyers could just be walking toward the door knowing they'll end up signing a settlement before they have to leave. They know they can call back the scarecrows and keep the crop growing a bit longer before they have to prove they got the goods and the goose.

If MSFT management and IP lawyers blow this, their plans for the next five years could be nothing but a question... and MSFT glory and money nothing but a painful fading memory for millions... of people... not just dollars. Millions times money. Tune in next time for 'Muckmuck's Travail' brought to you by 'Shake Chicken No Get Egg Make Bacon' the other alternative in throwback breakfast. 'No make eggos. Make pork.'...

click

...so shut up and let me think dammit. Where'd you put The Gun?

Duuhhh I put it in the cooler, Boss like you said.

You idiot. I said we need to hire a tooler... we're under The Gun... Under the guy they call 'The Gun'. You was supposed to put the guy in cubicle tree. Jeez am I ever going to get my money back on that education? You're a career criminal, steal some batteries and a hearing aid for crying out loud...

click

...and watch Mister Frickaseed say it real fast now... ready?

crispy critter
kitty litter
firecracker poo
you have no idea just what we'll do for you
if you gather round here we'll let you sniff the gloo
firecracker
tally wacker
sis is in the doo

click

Maw. Where's my wood leg?


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 3:46 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 May 2007 4:01 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Whisper whithers whether wanton, worried or wise.
Mood:  irritated
Now Playing: 'An Apology' Awkward silence broken by clumsy goose. (Fables)
Topic: Calamity

This is not a post. This here came from Robert Crinkly's blog here: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070511_002058.html  what enfurinated a army of hostile checkeekers. This years turkey is going to look like the underside of a schoolmarm's desk, pilgrim. No gummy lumps but they's probably teeth.

And like I said this is not technically a post even though it will tally up on the calendar to the left (your left, my left). This is much like one of those tags on the mattress you go to Folsom for tearing them off. Had me a uncle did twenty two years for a truckload of them tags. But they wasn't tore off so I don't exactly know what he went in the can for. It's all a conspiracy anyways. The little guy gets a kick in the pants and a how'd ya like that? for conversation.

Anywho... packing up a few more boxes of what-knots to bring over to Morrie's for safe keeping for a while. I'm going to miss packing poo into that little calendar doohicky to the left.

If I had been packing to the right, I would probably understand why this stupid tag was on a mattress in the first place.

05/10/2007 03:57 PM
From: ITD COMM/Somers/IBM
Subject: Rumors of massive layoffs

Patrick Kerin General Manager Global Technology Services - Americas

Joanne Collins-Smee General Manager Integrated Technology Delivery - Americas

Patt Cronin General Manager, Productivity Initiatives Integrated Technology Delivery

We have received many inquiries regarding the subject. If IBM responded to every rumor, we would get distracted from the important work of delivering value to our clients.

However, a recent external blog report suggesting that IBM is planning a massive layoff is causing unneeded activity. If this blog is generating concern in your unit, please feel free to use this information to assure your teams and business leaders that the blog is inaccurate, and relies on gross exaggerations.

The blog suggested we would be letting go more IBMers than we currently employ in the U.S. The facts are that our regular U.S. population is just under 130,000 IBMers -- a number that has remained relatively stable in recent years, as we have divested and acquired businesses and continued to invest through new hiring.

We said when we released 1Q results we would be putting in place a series of actions to address cost issues in our U.S. strategic outsourcing business. We have undertaken efforts toward that, and recently implemented a focused resource reduction in the U.S. While any such reduction is difficult for those employees affected, these actions are well within the scope of our ongoing workforce rebalancing efforts.

The blog also completely misinterpreted our efforts around Lean. To fully understand Lean, you have to view it in a strategic context -- a key part of what we're doing to reinvent service delivery to provide more value to clients and make IBM more competitive. We are using Lean, which is a commonly used methodology to conduct process design and development, to make informed decisions about how to improve and streamline processes. We are going about that in a disciplined and rigorous way, and the intent, as it has always been, is to improve our speed, quality and responsiveness to clients.

 http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070511_002058.html

all rights reserved  all pokes pickled all wanton sensationalism distributed under social contract IDDUDDUDDDDiddle

see trademarking department for concise packaging

no deposit no return 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 2:56 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 21 May 2007 3:43 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 17 May 2007
You can't fire me. I quit.
Mood:  bright
Now Playing: 'The Last Post' Accident prone Pony Express rider dragged by horse thru town discovers show biz. (Circus Minimus)
Topic: The DISCLAIMER

I was last out on a twelve way out of a Mullin's Kingair above 23000 feet. The 'above' part was thanks to a lovely pair of luschies distracting Mister Mike from his aeronautical duties and enticing the aviator to pour a little more kerosene and a little more stick into the climb max. Such is the way such business is done. Strangers can count on Somebody's Friend always chipping in an extra effort for the team.

When the floaters left, I couldn't hear the count, I couldn't see the sway, but I felt the surges pushed through each body back to me hunkered next to Mister Mike and little Luschy's Javelin container. I knew when the floaters were about to let go because the pulse and sway through the other 11 told me when they would launch and I followed that rhythm to its end.

So have I done here and now.

It's a weird feeling you have to develop a sense for. When to quit. It has everything to do with community in something like a skydive. It has to be felt and not seen and it results in a lunge toward something calling... in this tale's case the insatiable appetite to give gravity her due and cheat her out of the final embrace. To win against self at least. This kind of thing is hard the first times you do it. It all gets easy to feel when you do it often and a lot enough.

I've been doing 'this here' often and a lot and It's become too easy and and enough.

What I remember most about that particular jump is that I found myself last out on a 12 way with a hangedover at FL2x? sucking on a plastic cup and thinking; “If I were piloting this Kingair...” I would have desired a different part of the cake (negotiations would ensue, consensus from remaining jumpers could be employed, no doubt, to encourage the deal) and I would have given them so much altitude their eyeballs would look like hen eggs. Not a dis of the bakery goods displayed, mind you. Only a recognition that frosting was certainly all that and very well dolloped and molded, but the bottom layer, upon which the frosting was an artfully balanced act, amply supported all the above anticipations.

Dear me. If, on such a jump, I could have gravity and such a nice view before and after exit, it would make the fart smelling on the ride up ok and I wouldn't resent being roused from my alpha nap to stick a plastic gasper over my mouth and nose like some bloodshot prenatal tragedy.

Ahhh... alpha to delta naps. To fly asleep. To plummet weightless yet whole enough to awake for breakfast... I am insufferable in my condescension... I am beautiful in my elevated artistry. I am a stumbled drunkard lunging after a piece of ass with my hands gripped tight around her legstraps and hugging that colorful container like it was a teddy bear taken from a three year old trauma victim.

I don't remember making it to the door. Looking back, it's just a series of freeze frames... like the freeze frames of the lush countryside sliding under me on my first jumps. The eye catches images and the brain integrates. Sometimes the brain is 'enhanced' by impending shock or trauma or just the thrill of an oncoming newness and we see the frames unintegrated. We see the raw action without the brain filling in the blanks to make it a smooth movie. We know without having a chance to dawdle and tarry. We have to KNOW and the brain can't spare that kind of processing power just to give you a movie-like glide across the streaking earth. Especially just to let you “see” something you have little control over not hitting. Might as well put that processing power where it belongs... in making sure you execute the look reach pull and snag that D-ring first time or you're SOL with the jumpmaster.

I was taught to jump the first time by a HALO jumper on Nam era t-rounds with a rough attitude. Both him and the parachute. A stranger and stranger than a stranger. But, he was arguably best around and it was my good fortune to be trained by such a one.

I was taught to skydive by a Golden Knight. Before that, I was a falling frog. After that, I understood human form.

I also understood human psychology as one man was a stranger, the other a friendlier stranger... and the Luschy a future friend's anatomical dialect. Each taught me much. I can only hope I filled their time with some enhancement of any kind as they continue to enrich me continuously throughout my later life and I can no longer repay.

Last thing beautiful I remember about that jump was that shuffle shuffle samba feel of Luschy's plate full of cake down the aisle of the Mullins' Monster... belly into the breeze, flaps out full and engines chewing thin air to hold stable over the jump run to spot. The sway turned to lunge and we began the leaving. The plane's load was getting lighter with each body flung from the frame... and, came my time, I nudged Lucshy through the door and I followed her out into Mistress FL20+'s clearness and a deep blue bottom all her own... and the next thing I remember was cruising on the bubble of accelerating air at my core while my arms and legs swept into a track and I followed my part in the pie toward the distant base.

I remember that jump because it was my last high altitude jump. After that, I did a few more ways a couple big ways and then I quit. I quit because it was predictable. I quit because I had lost the oomph much less the zoom. I remember laughing at a guy who came into the dz one day and sold his rig because he had taken up golf. I didn't realize how wise he was until today.

I know a number of guys and girls who didn't heed the head and now? Not. I am. I want to be.

I quit jumping because I was engrossed in this company you read and wonder about and I was fascinated with what that company has and falling toward the beautiful scenery no longer consumed my concentration.

That's what the guy who quit for golf told me and it took me decades to learn. “When you find you know too much, stop thinking. There are some things better left to surprise.”

Now, following the company for me will turn into something like BS Steel or Johnson Paperclips and sell billions and that will become what even the most exciting things become... ultimately mundane. Such is the way such business is done. Strangers can count on Somebody's Friend always chipping in an extra effort for the team.

I'm quitting posting for a time because I've seen it all come to pass and I want to be surprised from here on. I've followed Emily's luschy ass every shuffle shuffle samba from the right seat to the exit door and now it's time for me to give myself to gravity and let her remind me why I live and breathe.

Some five hundred feet below me the base was pulling in lurkers from all around and the 'dohickey jiblet with frog gravy' formation we dirt dived came together as I raced to follow Luschy into the grips... and they disappeared into a cloud.

How that happened I will never know because no skydiver in recorded history has actually jumped into a cloud. That would be illegal and against parachutist law and legalese... but lore is always different, isn't it? Lore is the real story dressed up for a party. The record is something we do to allow us to work together with civility and not take heads from the neighborhood because somebody farted on the ride up.

VCSY lore sounds like drama, mystery and conspired flatuessence. It's the legal record that will run through that will define the true nature of the journey. It looks like it's turning out the way we figgered in the dirt dive. Amazingly like their original plan in 2000 but much larger scope if the lurkers in the outer orbits are truly a revenue source for the VCSY technology and expertise. It's really a bit more to take in than is necessary or believable... even for me.

How big and how much is what everybody always wants to know. “Ok, dude, like, I was here and she was there and she had his left grip and this guy was closing on your right slot and you were like all over the fricking place and I thought you had the grip but then we funneled and like...” “No no no that's not what happened. It funneled because Fat Walter bombed in on somebody's burble and took out the base.” By beer thirty somebody will tell a waitress they came as close as they have ever come to dying. But, the record is in with everybody that was there.

That's why skydiving doesn't catch on as a spectator sport. You have to be there. It looks too easy and you're watching films of guys who make it look easy. You should watch what normal jumpers look like on video. It's both hilarious and instructive. Imagine having seen an angel fly and trying to experience that same agility. Now think through what a skydiver is doing with bits of metal, cloth and string and, in some rigs, no metal required. what the human creature is capable of without wings. 'OK Walter, step two is we're going to take you up a few thousand feet in this metal tube with these big metal things sticking out and you're going to get out and...'

The secret is relaxation. The more relaxed body tends to adopt a shape conformed by the various pressures of the wind. Ahh grasshopper must learn to fall asleep while falling to death. Very odd game.

There are different stories about VCSY just as there were 11 other ways of telling the same tale above. Us twelve men and women of all kinds dressed in these funny suits and saying these funny words and dancing these stupid looking hunched over dances in the dirt and farting on a plane were a jury on humanity that day and always.

We lorded over the earth as of a generation chosen by our ancestor's efforts to have their children play in the sky. And touched to earth again confident we truly were gods... only to get back into the bank note and drive back to the box where we live and eat the cow or the pig or the what the hell is this? AGAIN?... and all we could hope for is that the afterglow of accomplishment would linger through at least tomorrows breakfast...maybe lunch.

The real world has a way of mixing up the human mind into believing “something else” is more important than the task at hand. There is a fixation on fast easy achievement and it is the surest killer lurking the machine shop, grenade pit, drop zone, hayloft, grease pit, mud hole.

I saw a guy fly into the ground at a dz. He held the square into a spiraling dive until impact. He held that turn for the remainder of his life, as it were. Square parachutes (ok they're actually rectangular but don't tell anybody at the dz that or they'll have to rewrite all the training manuals) are inflated by ram air. Remind you of anyone? They inflate with rammed air in the front and force the enclosed envelope to take on the shape of a fairly 'rigid' wing. You can fly that wing. You can fly it real good.

If somebody says in Atlantis there were these people who flew, believe them. You know there were not? Hell, all indications are anyone with not such high fabric technology can soar the cliffs off Fort Funston, so why not Atlantis? What? These guys know NASA profiles? Is that necessary? “Me make wing. Me jump off cliff. Not fall. Fly. Fly off cliff. Land beach. You new around here?”

Squares can be flown into the ground like any dynamic feature.

So, no $#!@, they dug this guy's compounded femur out of the dirt to turn him over in case something could be done. It could be for a while. They asked him what happened. Toggle lock up? Steering line knotted up? Are you with me, buddy? Turns out he was pissed at himself for missing a grip. He forgot to pull out of the spiral because he was engrossed thinking about something that had happened when it was safe to play around. It ain't safe to play around when you get close to gravity's breast. She bites if you suck.

There are always skeptical people when you tell any story. It's the nature of the probability curves on a population of analog brains to have one extreme of trust and then another.

Skeptics are always missing the bigger picture. You know what's the safer bet? If somebody says they fly; Believe them until they show they can't.

If I had met any of these 12 people on that plane in an office or a golf course and they told me they could fly, would I have believed it? Luschy could obviously float, but, could she fly? Really?

They flew. I saw them fly together. They didn't see me because I was last out. I saw them vanish into a cloud still hundreds of feet below me with Mike's screaming machine plunging vertical past the cloud's edge to make another busload to 23k. A cloud that came out of nowhere swallowed up my friends and I was forced to 180 and track to clear their space.

I would like to go back and join that party in the sky for a while. I think I've known and said enough about distributed architectures and now I would like to regain the facility to trash pack a zero p, cradle it in a container, and stow the pilot, pud or hackey as my wont may be.

I know how to type well enough so the exercise was worth the effort on at least that level. I don't have much to say at this point because I get that way before a jump. I get stupid. And this is a jump. It's a good feeling, actually. It's the kind of brainwaves that say 'Isn't that a lovely piece of cake? Know what? It's your birthday.” And you remember what you were thinking that day that picture of you and the birthday cake and the candles and all your friends were codified into ink or iodine. You remember... 'Wow. Them's some really pretty candles.' 


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 5:01 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 17 May 2007 5:09 AM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
One more for the rode.
Mood:  suave
Now Playing: 'Rickshaw Ricky' Cab driver in Hong Kong drives over puller's foot causing chain of events. (Comedy)
Topic: VCSY / MLE (Emily)

My two cents (we're almost there - next post I promise) I just had to chime in here with everybody else so there's a rounded view.

Yikes that's one ugly cut and paste job but I'm not cleaning it up. Screw that, I'm a short-timer. Time for beddy bye and the last post.

 

http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/viewreplies.cgi?board=VCSY&reply=185372 

 
Replies to Msg. #185372
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Date   
185374 Btr-n-u 4sirius2   17 May 2007  
2:10 AM EDT
185375 Also, the patent office may have issues with Emil 4sirius2   17 May 2007  
2:13 AM EDT
185377 btu n u: The patent pending 'Emily' was patent ap RapidRobert2   17 May 2007  
2:48 AM EDT

The above list shows replies to the following message:
By: btr-n-u
17 May 2007, 01:54 AM EDT
Msg. 185372 of 185378
Jump to msg. #  
Question

If Emily was used to create XML enabler....and XML enabler is patented....how come Emily is patent pending? I don't understand the sequencing here.

btri??


I like to think of  US 7,076,521 as covering what the MLE or the micro-kernel web server can be described as with the ability to use URL's, resources and network structure to construct a virtual machine. This is a native XML virtual machine. This can be used as a operating platform that is morphed into an application like the middleware XML Enabler Agent or any other form of software.


Emily is the attending programming language used to build applications based on this platform and theoretically able to use any other languages within the Emily framework to construct further applications and languages. The ability to abstract functional complexity from one level of complexity to another is an elemental feature of Emily as a language.

The ability to use native XML in the programming language to extend functionality is what qualifies Emily as a Very High Level Language.

So, to me at least, US 7,076,521 provides the virtual machines to build out an architecture and Emily is the architecture builder. Siteflash uses the concepts claimed in US 6,826,744  to provide an environment (ecology) to house and extend the Emily programming language using the MLE kernel as an agent, thus able to construct web-based applications including complex operating systems using networked resources via agents and any other technologies virtualized. 

Of course, I have an advantage in that I have a copy of the 2000 whitepaper on Emily so it's easy for me to see.

There. I feel better already. Where's my keys?.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 4:46 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 17 May 2007 4:49 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
You mind getting that?
Mood:  d'oh
Now Playing: 'Prom Date Dazzle' Sister's little brother tormented by her prom date. (Safety Training)
Topic: The Sneaky Runarounds

And, no, this isn't my last post. Actually, it's not technically a post. It's kind of like this grenade rolled by me and I'm just handing it off to you. It needs to be in Notable Opinions but this three legged thingie is pretty sparse on features, as it were, and not conducive to the categorizationing. The google (Laughing Place #3) site provides labels that would be good for searching if people like me were more conscientious and used them.

Anywho, another tricycle incident. Kid was pedalling up into tailpipes all day and somebody finally backed one up on him. That's a shame. Somebody should tell his mom.

By: peterd13
16 May 2007, 07:45 PM EDT
Msg. 185358 of 185376
(This msg. is a reply to 185300 by tepe.)

Tepe,

You have told us that you're not here for the very long haul - that you REALLY don't believe in this stock, and that you only invested here on a hunch without doing any DD until after the fact. And you've stated that you play 'the pennies' for short term gains...

So again, here we go:

Your post: "....If buying under 2 cents was so obvious, why wasn't eveyone doing it? The volume was in the toilet.

Sure, in retrospect I can tell anyone where they should have bought and sold a stock. But I'll bet even those who bought at under 2 cents are still holding on for the "big run"......"

To respond: It took only three days to accumulate more than 1,200,000 shares between 1.6 and 1.8 cents about 3-4 weeks prior to the Monday run up to 3.3 cents. There was plenty of volume. (Investment result: about $20,000 to buy; about $37,000 at the sell - which only took 4 minutes on that Monday....)

So, I know that you're not SERIOUS and you don't really believe that there are NO investors here that bought recently under 2 cents and sold above 3 cents.....Especially those of us, like you, who watch this stock nearly daily? The real question is (as I asked you in the post in question): "How come you didn't?!?!?!?!" I mean, to read your considerable posts over this past year, by your own words you're one savvy investor.....

http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=183409

Come on Tepe; this is a question of credibility!

You don't like the stock, you bash it constantly, but when there is money to be made (your stated purpose for being here, afterall....) you claim that it was just too difficult to 'see' it.....

my,my....you would like us to read and or pay attention to what you have to say, but to follow this stock this closely for more than a year, be an in and out kind of penny stock trader, and to have not made any money here at all (to still be at a paper loss) is just absurd!!

You have ZERO credibility

'nuf said

peterd13

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

 

Grenade! 

By: 4sirius2
16 May 2007, 10:29 PM EDT
Msg. 185366 of 185378
(This msg. is a reply to 185361 by tepe.)

Tepe, you mean you haven't even read the VCSY website or much of
the filings to know that Emily is the first product of Vertical
among all of them? Emily is the scripting language that was used
to create the XML Enabler. You might do well also to read
Portuno's older posts, start as far back as they go and move
forward to understand how integral it is, and to understand that
Emily can create many other fine products like the Enabler and
the Broker Agent. The Broker Agent? That's been around since
2000 and is in use for procurement. Get a grip, do some DD,
and stop wasting your time trying to convince the board that the
sky is falling on us. It's on you only you've had your back turned.

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

 

MORTAR ROUND! Hey buddy, pass this over to the guy in the green pants.

By: vcsymojo
16 May 2007, 10:54 PM EDT
Msg. 185367 of 185378

The little fish is a liar. One of the biggest liars in the history of the VCSY board. Everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie. If he is a shareholder, which is extremely doubtful because of his actions, i.e., bashing the stock the day after he supposedly bought, then he owns a few hundred shares, a few dollars worth. That is only a legal ploy so when the law goes after him, as it will, then his argument will be, "No, see, I own 500 shares of VCSY. I am a disgruntled shareholder. I have the right to my freedom of speech."

No, he doesn't. Someone can't yell "FIRE" in a crowded theatre, and little disgruntled miserable humans shouldn't be able to yell "SELL" because they're getting paid $6/hour and they have no other hope to make a decent life. I'm sorry he's mentally challenged and can only post lies to make a few bucks after the shift at the Burger King ends. That's why he pops on here every night at 8pm EST. The shift for the special education adults who can't get real jobs end, and the 16 year olds take over...That's what really pisses someone like the little fish off that he has to bow down and say "yes sir" to a pimply faced 19 year old who is his shift manager. I'd be mad all the time too. I'd come on here and scream and ##### and complain because my life was horrible.

He's a liar. He's a cheap pawn in a big player's game. He's a nobody. And one day, he'll be gone. His employer will want to spend that $6/hr. elsewhere and he'll go whine and complain somewhere else.

Pathetic life.

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)

Satchel charge! Uhhh, excuse me, buddy... mind standing in the way of these twenty thousand beebees?

By: RapidRobert2
16 May 2007, 11:25 PM EDT
Msg. 185368 of 185378

(This msg. is a reply to 185361 by tepe.)

That is simply more nonsense and false information from you. The 'XML Enabler' PATENT is not 'emily'...that is patent PENDING. Understand? 'EMILY' is PATENT PENDING, DUH!

Of course, what else do you have except False Information to bash with?

NOW, you show you don't even KNOW about the software that IS owned BY VCSY and YOU continue to BASH as if you do.

Well, by YOUR own posts, you ARE irrelevant since we NOW KNOW you do NOT even understand the technology of VCSY. YOU do NOT even understand the "patent" system and the courts. MSFT already tried with a 'CHALLENGE' and LOST...understand that word...microsoft LOST the CHALLENGE against the technology of VCSY.

microsoft WILL SIGN the LICENSE with Vertical Computer Systems and perhaps even PAY annual ROYALTY fees.

And, you bought FOUR times over MONTHS during the last YEAR, as you state, and still blame someone else for your not doing any research over all THOSE MONTHS.

You ARE NOT a shareholder, just a basher out to harm VCSY and attack supporters of VCSY.

Thanks for showing your LACK of KNOWledge. You fail even to understand the basics of the technology of VCSY and have claimed the 'Fiber Optic' patent won't work and you DO NOT even understand it or ANY VCSY PATENTS or the one PATENT PENDING...Don't go down the road trying to blame others for your LACK of KNOWledge. That won't work with the way you BASH this company.

RR
IMOi??

 

Oh, it's a scene, man. Kung Foo with goo foo.

 http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=BB:VCSY


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 2:38 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 17 May 2007 3:25 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older