by normnowak
if Niro was able to "scam" Microsoft out of $2.8 Million, how come he has NOT rang the door bell at IBM, Adobe, etc.? If Microsoft was willing to throw a bone, why not the others? Vcsy signed a "confidentiality agreement" with Microsoft.....The only thing that Vcsy will NOT comment on is ANYTHING dealing with Vcsy.....if Vcsy has NOTHING to release, that it can talk about, then i am lead to believe that EVERYTHING Vcsy is doing involves Microsoft.....finally, Wade holds 100 million shares of Vcsy....he had to know that agreeing to $2.8 million would NOT change his financial worth...dump that many shares on that kind of a settlement , leads to a crashing of the price in a matter of minutes....Wade had to have had an understanding with Niro about what kind of settlement they would agree to if the offer would come from Microsoft.....(Niro has to talk to clients about this because if Niro tells them to grab whatever is offered, Niro coud find himself being sued by his client at a later date for malpractice)....would Wade have gone through everything he did to NOT go to the markman, not go to trial just to keep his financial position THE SAME as it was PRIOR to the lawsuit? Wade was a CPA with a major firm, he is a bean counter by trade so he knows what is a logical sum to expect before agreeing to go to litigation.....niro is a patent lawyer...he knows the value and future value of the patent inwhich he is litigating over...no surprises occured inwhich Rovner had to sit down with the patent lawyer from chicago and the bean counter from texas and explain that Microsoft will "give" Vcsy some bus fare money to go back home.....we have seen NO other patent infringement lawsuits from Vcsy..we have seen NO malpractice suits filed against Niro from Vcsy...we have heard NOTHING about or from Vcsy after the confidentiality agreement was signed....interesting |
Posted by Portuno Diamo
at 2:13 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 30 July 2009 2:15 AM EDT
