Wednesday, 30 May 2007 - 12:23 AM EDT

Don't know if I may be right or wrong, but there is so much resistance on the bashers part in believing that the FO patent is impossible.  "You can't send data through without it getting mixed up" Blah Blah Blah.  Well maybe if you sent just data as it is through a single filament, and being data from different sources making it incompatable is would make it possible to get it mixed up.  But I thought VCSY patents make all data regardless of type arbitrary, which in a sense wouldnt make a difference while traveling through each single filament.  Perhaps its more simple than some of us may have thought and this feat of data over a single filament of cable is only something VCSY could achieve because of their ability to MAKE the data arbitrary.  I suppose ecapsulating data makes it all the same until it is decoded and unwrapped at the recieving end.  SO what difference would it make if what is sent through gets mixed up because in travel it is arbitrary.  Just a thought while I was at work cleaning wine glasses. 

Thursday, 31 May 2007 - 2:55 PM EDT

So Port, I was a bit off on the FO patent.   I read it, its about sending entire images over a single filament and not necessarily focused on data.  I have been thinking about the architecture of all this lately.  A normal home computer has the computer, which hooks itself to the screen and keyboard to transmit data.  With the possible coming changes towards the thin client, would the set up be that the optic cable to each home would almost be like a remote display to show what is happening at the transaction facilities and servers?  And the keyboard would be attached to a minimal processing unit at the home to send data to the bigger servers where all the good stuff takes place?

Friday, 1 June 2007 - 2:59 AM EDT

How about we let the world absorb the impact on the other patents and technology for now and we'll just let the fiber optic capabilities be a neat little surprise on all those little ol' unsuspectorants...