Mood:
d'ohNow Playing: 'Prom Date Dazzle' Sister's little brother tormented by her prom date. (Safety Training)
Topic: The Sneaky Runarounds
And, no, this isn't my last post. Actually, it's not technically a post. It's kind of like this grenade rolled by me and I'm just handing it off to you. It needs to be in Notable Opinions but this three legged thingie is pretty sparse on features, as it were, and not conducive to the categorizationing. The google (Laughing Place #3) site provides labels that would be good for searching if people like me were more conscientious and used them.
Anywho, another tricycle incident. Kid was pedalling up into tailpipes all day and somebody finally backed one up on him. That's a shame. Somebody should tell his mom.
By: peterd13
16 May 2007, 07:45 PM EDT
Msg. 185358 of 185376
(This msg. is a reply to 185300 by tepe.)
Tepe,
You have told us that you're not here for the very long haul - that you REALLY don't believe in this stock, and that you only invested here on a hunch without doing any DD until after the fact. And you've stated that you play 'the pennies' for short term gains...
So again, here we go:
Your post: "....If buying under 2 cents was so obvious, why wasn't eveyone doing it? The volume was in the toilet.
Sure, in retrospect I can tell anyone where they should have bought and sold a stock. But I'll bet even those who bought at under 2 cents are still holding on for the "big run"......"
To respond: It took only three days to accumulate more than 1,200,000 shares between 1.6 and 1.8 cents about 3-4 weeks prior to the Monday run up to 3.3 cents. There was plenty of volume. (Investment result: about $20,000 to buy; about $37,000 at the sell - which only took 4 minutes on that Monday....)
So, I know that you're not SERIOUS and you don't really believe that there are NO investors here that bought recently under 2 cents and sold above 3 cents.....Especially those of us, like you, who watch this stock nearly daily? The real question is (as I asked you in the post in question): "How come you didn't?!?!?!?!" I mean, to read your considerable posts over this past year, by your own words you're one savvy investor.....
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=183409
Come on Tepe; this is a question of credibility!
You don't like the stock, you bash it constantly, but when there is money to be made (your stated purpose for being here, afterall....) you claim that it was just too difficult to 'see' it.....
my,my....you would like us to read and or pay attention to what you have to say, but to follow this stock this closely for more than a year, be an in and out kind of penny stock trader, and to have not made any money here at all (to still be at a paper loss) is just absurd!!
You have ZERO credibility
'nuf said
peterd13
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)
Grenade!
By: 4sirius2
16 May 2007, 10:29 PM EDT
Msg. 185366 of 185378
(This msg. is a reply to 185361 by tepe.)
Tepe, you mean you haven't even read the VCSY website or much of
the filings to know that Emily is the first product of Vertical
among all of them? Emily is the scripting language that was used
to create the XML Enabler. You might do well also to read
Portuno's older posts, start as far back as they go and move
forward to understand how integral it is, and to understand that
Emily can create many other fine products like the Enabler and
the Broker Agent. The Broker Agent? That's been around since
2000 and is in use for procurement. Get a grip, do some DD,
and stop wasting your time trying to convince the board that the
sky is falling on us. It's on you only you've had your back turned.
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)
MORTAR ROUND! Hey buddy, pass this over to the guy in the green pants.
By: vcsymojo
16 May 2007, 10:54 PM EDT
Msg. 185367 of 185378
The little fish is a liar. One of the biggest liars in the history of the VCSY board. Everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie. If he is a shareholder, which is extremely doubtful because of his actions, i.e., bashing the stock the day after he supposedly bought, then he owns a few hundred shares, a few dollars worth. That is only a legal ploy so when the law goes after him, as it will, then his argument will be, "No, see, I own 500 shares of VCSY. I am a disgruntled shareholder. I have the right to my freedom of speech."
No, he doesn't. Someone can't yell "FIRE" in a crowded theatre, and little disgruntled miserable humans shouldn't be able to yell "SELL" because they're getting paid $6/hour and they have no other hope to make a decent life. I'm sorry he's mentally challenged and can only post lies to make a few bucks after the shift at the Burger King ends. That's why he pops on here every night at 8pm EST. The shift for the special education adults who can't get real jobs end, and the 16 year olds take over...That's what really pisses someone like the little fish off that he has to bow down and say "yes sir" to a pimply faced 19 year old who is his shift manager. I'd be mad all the time too. I'd come on here and scream and ##### and complain because my life was horrible.
He's a liar. He's a cheap pawn in a big player's game. He's a nobody. And one day, he'll be gone. His employer will want to spend that $6/hr. elsewhere and he'll go whine and complain somewhere else.
Pathetic life.
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)
Satchel charge! Uhhh, excuse me, buddy... mind standing in the way of these twenty thousand beebees?
By: RapidRobert2
16 May 2007, 11:25 PM EDT
Msg. 185368 of 185378
(This msg. is a reply to 185361 by tepe.)
That is simply more nonsense and false information from you. The 'XML Enabler' PATENT is not 'emily'...that is patent PENDING. Understand? 'EMILY' is PATENT PENDING, DUH!
Of course, what else do you have except False Information to bash with?
NOW, you show you don't even KNOW about the software that IS owned BY VCSY and YOU continue to BASH as if you do.
Well, by YOUR own posts, you ARE irrelevant since we NOW KNOW you do NOT even understand the technology of VCSY. YOU do NOT even understand the "patent" system and the courts. MSFT already tried with a 'CHALLENGE' and LOST...understand that word...microsoft LOST the CHALLENGE against the technology of VCSY.
microsoft WILL SIGN the LICENSE with Vertical Computer Systems and perhaps even PAY annual ROYALTY fees.
And, you bought FOUR times over MONTHS during the last YEAR, as you state, and still blame someone else for your not doing any research over all THOSE MONTHS.
You ARE NOT a shareholder, just a basher out to harm VCSY and attack supporters of VCSY.
Thanks for showing your LACK of KNOWledge. You fail even to understand the basics of the technology of VCSY and have claimed the 'Fiber Optic' patent won't work and you DO NOT even understand it or ANY VCSY PATENTS or the one PATENT PENDING...Don't go down the road trying to blame others for your LACK of KNOWledge. That won't work with the way you BASH this company.
RR
IMOi??
Oh, it's a scene, man. Kung Foo with goo foo.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=BB:VCSY
