Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« May 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Apple Fritters
Calamity
Chinadotcom and VCSY
DD to da RR
Endorsements
Facebook
GLOSSARY
Gurgle
HP and VCSY
Integroty
Microsoft and VCSY
Nobody Can Be That Stupid
Notable Opinions
Off the Wall Speculation
Panama
Pervasive Computing
Reference
SaaS
SOA
The DISCLAIMER
The Sneaky Runarounds
TIMELINE
VCSY
VCSY / Baseline
VCSY / Bashed
VCSY / Infotech
VCSY / MLE (Emily)
VCSY / NOW Solutions
VCSY - A Laughing Place #2
Tuesday, 1 May 2007
What the hell could go wrong? Hey, y'all, watch this!
Mood:  accident prone
Now Playing: 'Picking Up Pawpaws' Innocent school children uncover plot to hack community fruit tree down. Wan Ton Hooy (non-fiction)
Topic: TIMELINE

Yeah. THAT's rich. 

April 30th, 2007

My lunch with Ray Ozzie and Scott Guthrie

Posted by Ryan Stewart @ 2:30 pm Categories: Rich Internet Applications, Microsoft, Mix07
icn_balloon_154x48Worthwhile?

Ray OzzieJeff Sandquist of Microsoft set up a lunch for a few of us with Scott Guthrie and Ray Ozzie here at Mix07. It was a great group of people including Richard MacManus (his thoughts on the lunch are up here), Walt Ritscher, Lee Brimelow, Evan Williams, Linda Weinman, and a couple of other people. Overall it was a great session, we started off on some developer-centric conversation and then went into strategy with Ray.

I asked about the inclusion of the Dynamic Language Runtime, something Scott announced during his part of the keynote and something that garnered a bit of attention. I asked Scott what strategic point of it was and whether or not their developer base had been clamoring for the ability to write Ruby against the CLR. The answer to the second was 'not really'. It's compelling for them, but wasn't a huge draw. The answer to the first was that Microsoft wants to bring as many people as possible into the CLR and give them the freedom to choose what language they want. That's a good story, and I'm curious to see what the end result. Evan Williams, the creator of Twitter, one of the most popular Ruby applications out there said it was going to be great for his team because they could build a Silverlight application on top of Twitter using the same skillset they used to build Twitter itself.

The strategy questions were more interesting. In particular when Lee Brimelow asked Scott whether or not we could see an Apollo-type desktop client for Silverlight now that the CLR runs on Mac. Scott said no, but that precipitated a conversation about "in browser" experiences and "out of browser" experiences (I'm not sure Ray or Scott totally get Apollo). Ray said there is a lot of discussion within Microsoft about what applications should run in the browser and how important close ties to the operating system were for big applications. His insight here was excellent, as the founder of Lotus Notes, he talked about how they tried to create an "abstraction layer" so that they could be cross platform. He said focusing on that abstraction layer made them mediocre on all platforms. With WPF Microsoft gives developers a sandbox with all the trappings of a full desktop application, something users know and understand. With browser applications, he said that the model was a bit restrictive for full applications and said Silverlight will focus on enhancing the web experience and not trying to replicate the desktop. There was some talk of Apollo, but as I said, Ray didn't quite seem to grasp that Apollo applications are really desktop experiences with the ties that he mentioned being important. It will be interesting to see how that plays out between Adobe and Microsoft.

This was my first chance to actually chat and listen to Ray in a closer setting. I was really impressed. I think he really believes in the Rich Internet Application space, even if the implementation of the applications differs. I think it's going to be a good contrast for developers who are looking at the various RIA offerings. Flash and Silverlight aren't clones of each other. In many ways, they differ in their approach to enhancing the web.

 

Maybe, but I doubt it. Ray Ozzie is a smart and savvy guy. You can see it in the way he combs his hair. He gets Apollo alright. He has to or he wouldn't be Ray Ozzie. Any kid with a deterministic little heart and access to a whiteboard can get Apollo. What Ray doesn't get is that it doesn't belong to the company he threw in with. We all done it, doc. We all step in the doo. Try our best, we do. Do be do be do. That's the cycles and circles of friends and acquaintences that lure us in further and further where our egos should never go. Like slime on a pipe, ego is. As long as you see it from a distance... maybe a passing car, it's nothing innocuous. Just some gui green. But when you have to 'walk' across that pipe, Maw Dee make dee bed because you gonna be lying in that stuff undernearth the green pipe. And THEN where's your ego?

Uh...Better check with a patent attorney first, Mister Williams. A good one. Oh... and, better make it a good one and not your niece's nephew on your uncle's father's side. 

Or... you COULD inquire as to the standing of that November 2004 promise by Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to hold their product clients and customers harmless from any patent lawsuits they might bring upon them due to infringement by MSFT.

You might just want to check the fine print, mon sewer.  I do remember it weren't exactly everybody. Skate, dude. The trick is to not walk but skaaaaattteee.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:26 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 1 May 2007 11:42 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

View Latest Entries