Mood:  amorous

It's nice to see people read and learn. It does dearly fill me with happiness as I know once they read and begin reading further they will end up making the same inferences and assumptions most common folk would.

If there were some other interpretation of the information we see in an increasing stream every day over the past seven years of Vertical Computer Systems operation.

Here's their logo (Yippeeee Hoorayyy Yip Yip Yip Yahoooo!!!)

just to let you have no where my allegiance can be found as I am long VCSY and VCSY is long high technology. Meaning I own VCSY stock only with no relationships or contacts with the company or associated companies in any way shape or form.

I am simply stoked about their technology concerning which somebody in the US Patent Office screwed up and granted VCSY patents. Like I said, read Raging Bull VCSY.

Do not buy until you read the company filings as a first course. VCSY is an example of a development company at a 'startup' level. The speculations voiced by most longs is based on a read of the patent documents and the 'Emily' (Markup Language Exectutive (MLE)) Whitepaper available for a short time in 2000 from VCSY/EmilySolutions before their activities with IBM and Micrsoft in 2001.

Read the filings to know what those activities are before you begin reading any speculation. This is your money you are either going to win or lose. Be sure you know what you are buying and why you are buying. My confidence in the technology has produced nothing measurable in revenue for VCSY since introduction in 2000.

Could I be completely wrong about what I have speculated exists within and around VCSY? I could be, but, I sincerely doubt I am wrong. I may not be able to describe and elephant when I see one , but, when you can call out 'There's an elephant moving through the foliage.' and nobody sees it, that's one thing. Maybe he gots his cammies on. But in any safari I've ever heard about, if somebody says 'Elephant!' and a majority of the viewers turn their binoculars in that direction and ooohh and aahhhh, one can assume there might actually be an elephant out there or at least a tank that looks like an elephant.

That or they all et the wongawonga berries and won't come to reality until Wade tells them it was all a dream and tomorrow they will start selling a couple boxes of used video equipment they had in the basement, kicking off their 'Vertical Computers: 'The rest is in the back yard' sale.

Sandals and knee kickers half off.

I would be first in there looking for a king size buttkicker. But, I HAVE been looking for some stuff that would make me want to hit the 'AUTO' button on the buttkicker just to punish me for buying so much so early (since 2001 call me impetuous. Rasta Impetuous Rooster) and I can't find any.

I don't think we can say VCSY is in stealth operation and not understand stealth in a development company (at least the companies who understand the industrial espionage threats and activate accordingly) demands that the stealth extend to the business at hand. Development periods are large cash wells. I have been wondering where VCSY would be able to do what they are doing and what they appear to be doing and not show any income.

My brain wracked for quite some time. Like, a whole day or something. And, as hiding contracts or revenue flow within a corporation would be illegal, I would be certain Wade hasn't come all this way to hide money and get his corporation taken away from him. I know that's wishful thinking on some folk's part, but it's not realistic. I would more readily use Wade's old boss (Charles Feeney General Atlantic) methods as a model and look for philanthropy to facilitate VCSY technology development in stealth mode. THAT should bring a howl of indignant protest from the habitual and compulsive trash talkers?

The shareprice sucks. Yep. You got me there. VCSY.OB . But, when you know there are three extremely valuable patents owned by VCSY and that's ALL you know, I guess the more conservative investor is right in saying you should wait until the company shows considerable revenue before jumping in. In fact, they have been quoted as saying the 'wait for a dollar' strategy would be much more dependable.

That's up to you. One would have to wonder why so many 'conservative investors' sit on a discussion board such as the RB VCSY board and work so diligently to convince you to not invest your hard earned money on the VCSY 'SCAM'. That is what they called it not too very long ago.

Read a few posting histories of the infamous and you'll quickly see what VCSY longs on Raging Bull and other boards endured for years. YEARS! From people who owned anominal number of share (one had $204 worth of stock and he posted every day for years). Mental cases or mens rea cases? I guess we'll see once the VCSY longs get some pocket change from rounding off their share distributions to even thousands.

The outstanding shares too large? It's an artifact of the 20 for 1 forward split February 14, 2000. I believe Wade did the split to blow the float up so large there could be no market-based takeover by hostile operatives.

If Wade has what we think describes the elephant he's riding on, that almost a billion share float will distribute volatility in the shares owned by the principals and importantly a large base of shareholders holding and accumulating since 2000 of which I am one.

VCSY pronouncements in 2000 are mirrored in many things found recently regarding places Vertical technology may be shadowed. 

If you want to find out what speculation about VCSY is before RB finds out about what has been dug up out of the potato field, apply within ProgrammersHeaven.com. You'll think you done died and gone to VCSY speculation heaven... or hell depending on your attitude regarding the company.

For those of you who sold your Vertical shares in 2000 I want to sincerely offer my condolences. I am sorry you lost your money. You certainly may have an understandable reason to be bitter about losing that money and thinking you were cheated depending on which side of the fence blame may be placed for the decline in VCSY shareprices from 2000 onward. I think you may find after only a small bit of reading VCSY was under attack during 2000 that almost brought the company down. If you could run a marathon with a couple thugs pounding on your legs then I guess Wade should have just sucked it up and trudged on ahead with full-open visibility. I don' tthink you could run a company as well as Wade has demonstrated. Of course, it's 'What have you done for me lately?' in this shareholder/sharecropper world. But one thing we can be sure about in this world is: VCSY did not die.

Those of us who held on since then have every right to celebrate a hard earned win. I hope you will not find it necessary to p on the parade with moans and groans about how you wish you had known sooner? or why didn't anybody tell you? and what's the next buy-in point and why? You coulda we woulda you shoulda.

Some of us will be bitterly bitter (not me, I just want to spread some literary empathy from the writer - I can feel your pain brother. I can almost hear your cries of anguish sister. Don't kick the dog.), though, for being left behind.

But I think responsibility should always go where it belongs.

On you. 

Face facts. You weren't left behind. Somebody convinced you to leave.

Now that you're back I hope you can get 'stoodied up' as the spring breakers say, 'prayed up' as the fundamentalists say and 'koolaid up' as the JimJonesers might say. You have a lot of catching up to do. Good luck with all that.

Newbies to the Vertical story: What others tell you, verify for yourself. Ask questions of the folks on Raging Bull. You will know who is telling you truth and who is pumping bilge and sediment.

And one more thing. If you don't have a sense of humor, screw you. Ha. Ha. Ha.

Posted by Portuno Diamo at 5:04 AM EDT

Updated: Tuesday, 17 April 2007 12:44 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink