« April 2024 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics
Announcements
Growth Charts
Memories  «
Prenatal Visits
Soundings
Technical Trading
The Squirts
Ultrasounds
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Port's Pot
Sunday, 22 March 2009
X Marks the Spot
Mood:  a-ok
Now Playing: "Stupid Goes to School" Imposter suddenly surrounded by experts (reallity)
Topic: Memories

 Sorry the text rendering on this site is screwed up so, here's a much more readable version:

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3810960476663402897&postID=2251760952382393551 

We ask that you be patient with us in this transition.

 

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?  

http://humourvideosonline.blogspot.com/2007/09/stupid-mirror.html 

 

The following text was cut and pasted and didn't do well in the execution:

 

Poor mirror needs a reason to post on Raging Bull and Yahoo very badly. So he's resorted to chasing Portuno the Great anywhere he can have a chance at getting a response. Mirror intentionally holds a dying view on the new technology era. He must actively ignore and dismiss new developments as only a delusion and marketing hoax. Time has not been kind to Mirror's credibility. Time has crippled the Microsoft shareprice. Mirror's mindset is what is responsible for the Microsoft shareprice. Ballmer was an early proponent of Mirror's views. Time has now shown Mirror lost the argument. Now he's about to lose his job. Those he represents have lost much because the software industry positions they have tried so hard to protect have changed to what VCSY intellectual property predicted from 2000. http://vcsy.blogspot.com/2007/11/lets-do-ragingbull-tos-dance.html August 25, 2008 8:19 AM mirror said... Portuno has been completely discredited by VCSY's own management and has been under legal scrutiny for penny stock pumping. Be careful when reading anything Portuno says. He does not have a technical background. March 13, 2009 6:55 AM mirror said... Portuno has abandoned his delusional VCSY cause and you won't seem him posting about it here, or anywhere. It seems like there has been legal action taken against him for pumping this his favorite penny stock with lies and deceit. You should ignore everything he has ever written. It will all be removed in due time anyway. March 22, 2009 10:33 AM Anonymous said... Portuno says: Poor mirror is desperate for a chatting partner so he can justify his vociferous campaign against VCSY. Mirror missed being able to even understand the significance of the powers in VCSY's IP to predict massive, interoperable distributed computing which came to be known as "cloud" computing circa 2008-2009. Microsoft's entry into the cloud computing era is Azure which Microsoft announced November 2008. Azure matches claims of patent 6826744 quite well. Microsoft's hesitance to move Silverlight 3.0, Azure and Sharepoint as a full-force integrated concept indicates they don't have hold of the 521 patent permission. We see VCSY delaying the court date indicating VCSY is in the middle of negotiations. We see Ballmer talking about all kinds of "future" work but not able to say he's on top. "If I win..." is how he describes the future for him. And Mix09 fritters by with nothing but IE8 being released as a "surprise" that was sorely needed by Microsoft. Here's IBM and Sun about to strip the market share off Microsoft partners and Ballmer still has nothing to power his partners and client into the heart of the internet platforming concept TODAY. But, today like every other day since 2000 mirror has been pushing one view that's been continuously eroded as time marches on. Mirror missed it because he's been dedicated to the same attitude Larry Ellison used to describe cloud computing as a hoax and bogus and "been done before". Mirror's been shown by his own declared ignorance to be a consistent loser in arguments and events. Of course, Larry Ellison has long since changed course and become a cloud computing vendor. But he's very far behind the curve as Fusion shows only limited capabilities when compared against what IBM and Adobe are able to show. Those who believe like Mirror have suffered a serious setback in their ability to match the current track of those who adopted cloud computing concepts. Mirror continues to hold a failed technology view with no-one to debate any technology with him... while the market shows his technology views are all dated and wrong. VCSY's IP predicted the cloud computing age and the delays taken by VCSY in ending the Ross trial shows VCSY could play a card in the Ross trial that may impinge MSFT given the trail MSFT and CDC/Ross took over the years. Remember, the court hearing of March 18 was to show reason why Judge Solomon should not end with a judgment - that judgment being against Ross. Apparently VCSY has some reason to hold Judge Solomon from rendering their verdict. Sounds like a hammer sitting above the head of anyone who thinks they can simply wait and muscle VCSY out of their position. VCSY has all the time they need. Microsoft does not. CDC does not. As they continue, they must show cards to the industry as IBM + SUn and Adobe walk into formerly owned Microsoft territory and replace the costly Microsoft software with Microsoft-like solutions that cover the 95% of Office use cases. The longer Microsoft walks timidly in the web world, they are vulnerable. Mirror knows that. He knows the game is to play the hammering as long as they can to drive VCSY into accepting what Microsoft is offering. Apparently it's not good enough for Wade. So mirror's work is to distort and damage the public conversation about VCSY and the reputation of VCSY and VCSY's management and shareholders. Wade has had to keep things as secret as he can legally do. Mirror adapts to that defense by using it as an offensive weapon. Mirror characterizes the silence as "suspicious"... all the while unable to explain why his excessive time on message is supposed to be not suspicious. As he applies his work in the last few days before this next Ross case hearing of March 28 he has to be wondering who will blink first; Wade or Ballmer. Ballmer has Ozzie's harried and bewildered engineers pounding on him to get Microsoft into the web game before it's all over for Microsoft. Wade has VCSY shareholders demanding answers to questions they themselves can't create. Mirror's future depends on the outcome. I like watching the whole thing, actually. It proves a great deal to me and justifies my time spent writing about VCSY technology.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 3:18 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 23 March 2009 1:18 PM EDT
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
Settlement with Stipulations
Mood:  a-ok
Now Playing: What's Up Pussycat? - Step up the stairs, don't stare up the steps (collide-a-scope)
Topic: Memories

http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=217132

By: RapidRobert2
29 Jul 2008, 09:27 PM EDT
Msg. 217132 of 217178
(This msg. is a reply to 217130 by beachbumlb.)

UPDATE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL BY COURT IN EAST TEXAS...SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL..SO WE SHOULD GET NEWS THIS WEEK!

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-144 (DF-CE)
§
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, §
§
Defendant. §
§
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and
Defendant Microsoft Corporation (referred to collectively as “the Parties”), through their counsel
of record and subject to approval of the Court, that:
(1) All claims presented by the Complaint, as well as all counterclaims thereto, shall
be dismissed with prejudice as to each of the Parties; and
(2) The Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Case 2:07-cv-00144-DF-CE Document 65 Filed 07/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
2
DATED: July 29th, 2008
/s/ Eric M. Albritton (with permission) /s/ David J. Healey
John Ward, Jr.
LAW OFFICE OF T. JOHN WARD, JR., P.C.
111 West Marshall Street
Longview, Texas 75601
(903) 757-6400 Telephone
(903) 757-2323 Facsimile
Eric M. Albritton
ERIC M. ALBRITTON, P.C.
P.O. Box 2649
Longview, Texas 75606
(903) 757-8449 Telephone
(903) 758-7397 Facsimile
Raymond P. Niro
Vasilios D. Dossas
Sally Wiggins
Robert A. Conley
Eric J. Mersmann
NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO, LTD.
181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 236-0733 Telephone
(312) 236-3137 Facsimile
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
David J. Healey
Lead Attorney
State Bar No. 09327980
david.healey@weil.com
Amber H. Rovner
State Bar No. 09223750
amber.rovner@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
700 Louisiana, Suite 1600
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 546-5000 Telephone
(713) 224-9511 Facsimile
Timothy E. DeMasi
tim.demasi@weil.com
Ryan R. Owens
ryan.owens@weil.com
Brian Eutermoser
brian.eutermoser@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
(212) 310-8000 Telephone
(212) 310-8007 Facsimile
Anwar Imam
anwar.imam@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
(650) 802-3000 Telephone
(650) 802-3100 Facsimile
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Case 2:07-cv-00144-DF-CE Document 65 Filed 07/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who
have consented to electronic service on this the 29th day of July, 2008.
/s/ Ryan R. Owens
Ryan R. Owens

- - - - -
View Replies »


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:53 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 30 July 2008 12:04 AM EDT
Sunday, 6 July 2008
Rah Rah Ree. Kick 'Em In Da Knee. Rah Rah Ras. Kick 'Em in Da Other Knee.
Mood:  a-ok
Now Playing: Shaken Pompons - High school football highjinks (bawdy ballplay)
Topic: Memories

Well, congratulations to the patent pending process for Emily. A Method and system for providing a framework for processing markup language documents going through a renewed review by the patent examiner as submitted May 19, 2008. The citations you see below are typically noted by the patent examiner for each application and provide information relative to the application under review.

I believe such citations downstream give affirmation to the defineable advancements embodied in the claims of  Emily. A Method and system for providing a framework for processing markup language documents.

Patent citations can be informative...
http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/support/patents/dwpiref/reftools/searchtips/searchtip_oct
What is a citation?
In the context of patents, a citation is a reference to a previous work which is relevant to the current patent application. These citations are to be found in the search reports which the patent office examiners produce when they check that a particular invention really is new. And because it is the patent office examiners who have made the connection between new ideas and existing ideas we know that the connection must be valid - after all, the examiners are unbiased and they are experts in their fields.

Citations can be existing patents of course - but they might also be non-patent publications such as journal articles, conference papers or trade literature. If you can find a list of citations associated with an invention you already know about then you have, in effect, found a good quality reading list.


...and valuable.
http://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecinnt/v14y2005i5p375-393.html
Patent citation data are used in a growing body of economics and business research on technological diffusion. Until now, there exists little evidence on whether patent citations are a good measure of knowledge flows.

Thanks to stillwtr19 for posting the following:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/viewreplies.cgi?board=VCSY&reply=214843

By: stillwtr19 
06 Jul 2008, 01:59 AM EDT
 Msg. 214843 of 214848
Jump to msg. #  
Five patents referencing patent pending Emily. A Method and system for providing a framework for processing markup language documents. Last up date...05-19-2008 Date Forwarded to Examiner

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/REF20030037069.html

1) 7349916 Information organization using markup languages
The presentation of information in HTML files is desirably en hanced by the use of one or more separate scripting Javascript™ files, referenced from the HTML file, which uses information...

Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation (Armonk, NY, US)


2) 7349905 Local client database for remote support
A layered message architecture has been described that communicates status data from a client computer to a server through a remote support network. A database interface layers isolate the...

Assignee: Everdream Corporation (Fremont, CA, US)


3) 7299414 Information processing apparatus and method for browsing an electronic publication in different display formats selected by a user. An formation processing apparatus that performs language translations, wherein content data includes text data having the same meaning, written in a plurality of languages, and enclosed by...

Assignee: Sony Corporation (JP)


4) 7219339 Method and apparatus for parsing and generating configuration commands for network devices using a grammar-based framework. A method of automatically parsing a network device configuration and generating a representation of one or more configuration commands for a network device that uses a command-line interface, using...

Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc. (San Jose, CA, US)


5) 6862588 Hybrid parsing system and method
A system and method are provided for parsing a markup file. The present system includes a hybrid parser that employs both a lightweight parser and a heavy weight parser to parse a markup file. The...

Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Houston, TX, US)

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)
 
----------

And this bit of treeforter mail I thought the reader should see. Think through what you see when you see these things. By the way, there is information linking VCSY to both Infinitek and Netriplex.

Hey Morrie!
Hope you and the rest of the longs had a great 4th of July! I hope Mr. Wade adds to the fireworks that I saw last night! I went to the Adobe site and clicked on the partner portal link just to see if the VCSY picture was still there. It is! But I noticed the same picture( I had not noticed this before) of the lady in the glasses on Adobe's link here:

 
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/partnerportal/index.cfm

As the picture that shows up on the InfiniTek. biz site here:

http://www.infinitek.biz/

Is that not interesting? It cannot be a coincidence. Remember too that this lady is on the Netriplex site also:

http://www.netriplex.com/network/technology.aspx

Many have tried to explain items such as these matching photos and other matching photos on Verizon and NOW Solutions and Adobe as "clipart coincidence".

The only problem is, I don't think anyone's been able to find other examples of such clipart anywhere.

I also find it incredible these companies would allow such similar branding collateral given obvious speculation about the relationship between these companies and VCSY. How would their attorney's explain away such coincidences?

What do you think?

UPDATE

Remember the nice lady on infinitek? She's not there now. http://www.infinitek.biz/


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 11:17 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 8 July 2008 9:12 PM EDT
Saturday, 31 May 2008
Dropping a brick in the toilet is OK IF you do it right.
Mood:  bright
Now Playing: What's The Plan, Man? - Hippies conquer the whole "peace and love" thing (lost priorities)
Topic: Memories

I thought I might place this here to see if any mice (or rats) stick their head(s) in the traps. We don't want no nasty varmints nibbling on snookywookums little sticky-out things, now, do we? Noooooo.

We haven't talked for a long time about the global plan for a planet-wide network. It's been in the works for a long time, even though it may have been flubbed for a while by those who can't perform the critical junctures and don't want their monopolies compromised.

http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/371/kellogg.html

IBM Systems Journal

Volume 37, Number 1, 1998
Internet Computing

NetVista: Growing an Internet
solution for schools

NetVista™ is an integrated suite of clients and servers supporting Internet access for students and teachers in kindergarten through 12th-grade schools. Developed by a small team of IBM researchers, NetVista is a prime example of using an object-oriented framework to support user-centered design and to accommodate Internet-paced changes in network infrastructure, functionality, and user expectations. In this paper, we describe salient aspects of NetVista's design and development and its evolution from research project to product. In particular, we discuss the factors supporting a sustained focus on end users over the life of the project, the object-oriented framework underlying NetVista, and the role of this framework in accommodating both evolutionary and radical changes to the design of the user interface and the underlying technical infrastructure.

NetVista began as a research project at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center in late 1993, and evolved through several stages until its release in June, 1996, as IBM's K-12 solution for Internet access. The research motivation for the project included the desire to explore the capability of Smalltalk (an object-oriented programming language and development environment) to handle a communication-intensive client/server application and to simplify the complexity of the Internet and its use, which at the time was fairly daunting, particularly for nontechnical users.  

(more at URL - you were expecting me to cut and paste the whole thing?)
-------------------

What do you mean "What does it mean?"? You certainly don't think I'm going to explain the whole thing right here right now, do you?

Besides, you've got more reading to do so you can familiarize yourself with the kinds of concepts that were floating around back in the early 90's and THEN you can tell your self you know where technology is going today.

Think it through a bit, sweety. Think through what Netvista intended to achieve. Think through what Microsoft thought they were going to achieve with Vista. Think through the aims, desires and dilemmas the rich and powerful have had in their noodles for decades and then, perhaps (but I doubt you have the nuglets for it) we can talk about this titanic struggle between greed and altruism and where it will take us (to hell in a hand-basket as granny used to say).

We haven't talked about the conspiracy theories for a long time. Perhaps it's time to re-open the book and read about Life and where we're all headed.

Too heady for a children's story? Grow up. Fast. "We" don't have much time.

(added June 1)
Now, think through this...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairo_(operating_system)
Cairo used distributed computing concepts to make information available instantly and seamlessly across a worldwide network of computers.

Although Cairo never emerged as a shipping product, its main features were shipped as parts of other Microsoft operating systems.

(more at URL)
------------------

...and explain how it is Microsoft has spent billions and billions to accomplish what IBM has accomplished today. Now, Microsoft is still marooned as an island of automation while IBM is delivering on their plans.

"Distributed computing" was a goal for all of the 90's and most of the first decade of the 21st century. All other players are working toward that goal with the internet as the underlying infrastructure of their efforts. What is keeping Microsoft unable to mate to other operating systems across the internet?

OR...

Was it all just a strategy to choke off small innovators?

http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/Q4.06/4E2A8848-5738-45B1-A659-AD7473899D7D.html
1990-1995: Microsoft's Yellow Brick Road to Cairo
Thursday, December 14, 2006

The tactic worked so well that Microsoft repeated it in the following decade as Longhorn. Here's how it happened, and why Microsoft won't be able to repeat the same fraud again.

Cairo, like Apple's Pink, was vaporware. It was a loudly announced vision of the future to distract from the current realities of the market. Just as Apple's Pink was supposed to eventually match all the things NeXT had already delivered, Microsoft's Cairo announced things that would not be deliverable for a decade or more.

Microsoft simply had no car worthy of competing in the race, so it drew up an impressive picture of flying race rocket instead. The press, impressed by this compelling Cairo illusion, stopped comparing the ridiculously lame Windows 3.0 and DOS to the contemporary Macintosh and NeXT, and instead began comparing Apple and NeXT’s existing products to the future promises of Cairo.

Even NeXT believed Cairo would turn up eventually.

Like other victims of vaporware, NeXT had trouble selling reality because everyone only wanted to hear about Microsoft’s fictional plans that would not end up getting delivered for another half decade or more; significant parts of Cairo would never be delivered at all.

Unhindered by Reality
Without having to accommodate legacy compatibility with existing applications, and artificially isolated from having to compete in the market against real opponents, Microsoft was free to imagineer a magic future for a world ready to believe that everything Microsoft could plan would be delivered at some point, even though Microsoft had absolutely no history of delivering any significant or original operating system technology.

Microsoft's distraction hand was waving a hand of five Aces, but rather than questioning how that could even be possible, the press just gushed about how great Microsoft's future looked. The company's bluffing was actually empowered by the uncritical appraisal of the press, which only encouraged Microsoft to continue in announcing unrealistic plans.

(more at URL - well worth reading and bookmarking)
------------------
 
Vaporware? Distraction? Decoys? Industrial fraud?
 
Could that be happening today? After Cairo? After Longhorn?
 
How would you know? Microsoft is in stealth mode. Just ask Ozzie.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 10:52 PM EDT
Updated: Sunday, 1 June 2008 12:56 PM EDT
Thursday, 8 May 2008
What does the piper pay for mice?
Mood:  caffeinated
Now Playing: Making Rain in the MUD - Weather reporter gets hit with cold front and drizzles (adult intent)
Topic: Memories

Conspiracy? Did portuno hear the word "conspiracy"???

Want another "conspiracy"?

OK. How about this one?

SavaJe was a java based smart phone platform for distributed applications.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SavaJe

which was introduced in 2001. It had many things going for it... had.
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS8885915946.html

One of its backers was Ken Ross, the namesake of Ross Systems which had its legacy trashed by the actions of the CEO Patrick Tinley and the corporation chinadotcom. That's right, the same Ross Systems that tried to take NOW Solutions away from VCSY...and lost. The same chinadotcom that bought Ross Solutions and continued the fight for NOW Solutions... and lost.

During those years from 2001, SavaJe looked poised to take the stage as a key mobile platform. Ken Ross must have been pleased even though his namesake company was being ground into the dirt.

Then, suddenly and without warning, SavaJe closed down October 25, 2006.

Sun bought SavaJe in April 12, 2007 and subsequently released JavaFX a month later May 9, 2007.

...and then Sun released "for real" JavaFX May 8, 2008... expected to be delivered "this fall".

Sun is in the same posture as Microsoft. Promise and delay. Promise and delay.

Silverlight is supposed to be Microsoft's answer to Adobe AIR eventually. So far, it's barely a competitor to Adobe Flash.

JavaFX is supposed to be Sun's answer to Adobe AIR eventually. So far, it doesn't exist.

What happened to Ken Ross' dream of having THE distributed platform for mobile computing? Well, when VCSY built  the distributed extention of Apollo-smart for Apollo industries using MLE/Emily, the field got crowded and the intellectual property issues came into play, I would say, the reality of a superior platform kicking SavaJe's Java based distributed kernels down the stairs became a stare-down.

Patent 7076521. This is the intellectual property root VCSY used for the Apollo smart card platform. Read the patent and then study JavaFX. The idea was to take the Java language developed originally for smart cards in 1995 and build the language out as the extensible platform. That never quite happened.

Although Java has many uses and capabilities, it also has problems and is ever on the verge of sucking industry dirt. It's why the industry hasn't been able to scale mobile applications to cover other areas of communications.

Sun is trying to stay in the game, but is behind the timeline compared to Adobe.

Interesting, isn't it, that the scenario for the VCSY IP back in 2005 would predict Sun and Microsoft would split in their SOA efforts of 2005 at some point when Sun realized Microsoft couldn't fulfill its promises for a solid SOA framework.

That happened in April 2006 amid turmoil about Vista's future - and Sun would go looking for a better way to IBM.

Maybe Sun found a better way that summer and made atonement for the Java transgressions through the years by sucking up what was left of SavaJe after the company went teats up 90 days after the 7076521 patent was granted.

Conspiracy? It doesn't take much more than just misguided attitudes and manipulated motives to make a series of events look like a conspiracy. But, events in train and coincidental with other supporting activities do demonstrate some sort of ... some sort of... some... uhhh, do we have a word in the English language for "covetousness"?


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 1:15 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 8 May 2008 1:47 PM EDT
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
For those who wear their socks out:
Mood:  lazy
Now Playing: Paddling in the Skivvys - Girls' socker team gets beat badly and enjoys it. (adult thought)
Topic: Memories

I was surprised to see this post when it was first made. I thought I might put it here to show I'm not the only crack-pot in the building.

http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=VCSY&read=197812+&submit=Go&endat=212474&numposts=60

By: arthurarnsley
18 Sep 2007, 09:13 PM EDT
Msg. 197812 of 197812
(This msg. is a reply to 197797 by shavisirons.)

shavisirons - You mentioned, "Yo and others here, with their techno knowledge, seem to think VCSY's patents hold the key to revolutionizing IP, or whatever, as we know it."

Shav, the moment VCSY announced a computer program application in an arbitrary framework that would separate Content, Form and Function of a computer application so that each may be accessed or modified separately I knew a Software/Internet revolution was coming based on the VCSY concept. This program was patented by VCSY and is now the '744 patent. If I had never heard of Portuno or Robert or if the Raging Bull VCSY board had never existed the result for me would still be the same. I've never been a programmer but I did work In IBM Field Engineering for 22 years and must have absorbed more than I realized. At least I absorbed enough to recognize unbridled genius when I saw it.

I am not surprised that the revolution is at hand. I am only surprised that it took so long to get here. Six years ago I assumed that in two years the old techniques would be replaced by the new. I didn?t know that VCSY could not start selling the product back then as doing so would establish a very low value for the product and get it out into the public forum before VCSY had patented control of it. VCSY executives did know that they had to contain their product until the patent was approved. Only after patent approval could they start selling licenses for it. Meanwhile, the thieves did break in and steal.

The bright spot here is that the patent is approved, the product has never been sold by VCSY and the Company has apparently been watching Microsoft for years surreptitiously developing their own programs using VCSY?s product.

My own unbridled enthusiasm for the ?744 product and other VCSY products has caused me to go totally overboard in buying VCSY shares at the exclusion of all else, especially in the last three years. When Microsoft tries to steal VCSY products they are directly stealing from the value of my stock portfolio. They are stealing from me.

Microsoft stealing from other small companies is nothing new. I?ve seen several battles go to court with Microsoft eventually paying off. I?m confident Microsoft will be told by the court to pay VCSY for license and use of the ?744 patent for both past and future use of it.

Being in the Eastern Texas Federal Court does not harm VCSY?s position but it should not make any difference which district court the lawsuit is in. VCSY has an extremely strong case, strong management and one of the strongest Intellectual Property Attorneys in the world.

Best wishes

Arthur


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 10:19 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 29 April 2008 10:27 PM EDT
What did Farmer Brown Plant?
Mood:  hug me
Now Playing: Pumpkin Patch Pooch - Giant squash plant makes grease-spot out of family pet (excessive go and lots of poo)
Topic: Memories

Before we dive off in the potty pool here, let's take a glance back in the day to the kind of visions Bill Gates had for XML based technology.

I know this is seeing the world from Microsoft's view and what's that got to do with anything, but there's a reason for looking at how Bill Gates viewed the future. It's what he expected to leave as a legacy... not what he currently got stuck with.

Note the January 2003 lifting of the code name "Palladium" and the use of "now referred to as the next-generation secure computing base for Windows".

Microsoft was ready to take this to the field. The marketing posture was cast in that phrase. Have they brought that to the field? Not yet. 

But THIS, was back in the day when Bill was feeling free and easy.

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/Jul02/07-24NETDayUmbrellaPR.mspx

Bill Gates Details Vision for Phase Two of .NET and Future of Web Services

Microsoft Announces Release Candidate 1 of Windows .NET Server, Previews Next Wave of Platform Technologies

EDITORS' UPDATE, January 25, 2003 -- Microsoft has discontinued use of the code name "Palladium." The new components being developed for the Microsoft® Windows® Operating System, which are described in this article under the code name "Palladium," are now referred to as the next-generation secure computing base for Windows.

REDMOND, Wash., July 24, 2002 — Microsoft Corp.'s Chairman and Chief Software Architect Bill Gates today outlined the company's vision and road map for phase two of Microsoft® .NET, the company's two-year-old software initiative for connecting information, people, disparate systems and devices. This next phase continues to build upon the XML-based interoperability of Web services, broadening the benefits to individuals, developers and organizations of all sizes. These efforts encompass software investments to help break down the technological barriers between people, systems and organizations as well as barriers to greater knowledge, trust and everyday use.

This next wave of technology investment builds upon today's Web services foundation to provide tangible benefits for the IT industry and goes beyond it to support dynamic business relationships between companies. Likewise, information workers will realize even greater productivity gains than they have in the past decade as Web services unlock critical information and enable them to make better business decisions. At the same time, Microsoft is providing a platform for innovation and opportunity that not only serves the needs of customers, but also of partners and the industry as a whole.

"In just two years, we've gone from debut to delivery of the first generation of Microsoft .NET. It's incredibly gratifying to see both its technology and its value to customers proven in the marketplace," Gates said during a briefing for press and analysts. "The broad industry consensus around XML-based Web services gives us a tremendous foundation for breakthrough work in many areas. The focus of phase two of .NET is on software that creates connected customer experiences that transform the way people live and work."

Breaking Down Barriers to a Connected World

Building upon the first phase of .NET that included the delivery of Visual Studio® .NET, a comprehensive suite of developer tools launched earlier this year, as well as the broad support for Extensible Markup Language (XML) and Web services across Microsoft's line of .NET Enterprise Servers, Jim Allchin, group vice president of the Platforms Group, outlined five areas of focus for the future. These areas capture the breadth of the company's future platform investments, all focused on breaking down technological barriers:

Breaking down barriers between systems and organizations. Tackling the problem of making it easier to connect different businesses and computer systems in a networked world, Microsoft described how it is advancing XML-based Web services working with the industry to provide a comprehensive foundation for distributed computing. Specifically, Microsoft demonstrated technologies that advance the XML Web services foundation to meet the requirements of businesses connecting their own disparate systems securely and reliably. Allchin also announced release candidate 1 (RC1) for Windows® .NET Server, which includes native support for the .NET Framework and will prove to be the most productive platform available for developing, deploying and managing XML Web services. Windows .NET Server will be one of the first products of the second phase of .NET.

Breaking down barriers to trust. Identifying security, privacy and reliability as critical to realizing trustworthy computing, Microsoft detailed key investments to advance these goals, including "Palladium," a recently disclosed effort to create a new architecture for building trusted hardware and software systems. Microsoft also demonstrated forthcoming Microsoft Passport privacy and consent tools offering users more control of personal information in their digital world. In particular, Allchin demonstrated new technologies that will allow Passport users to easily and explicitly control their personal information on a site-by-site basis, enabling a richer and more private online experience.

Breaking down barriers between people. Every communications mechanism -- e-mail, phone, instant messaging, group collaboration tools -- forces individuals to adapt to its approach. Microsoft's vision for next-generation communications uses Web services to enhance digital meetings and group collaboration and provides information-agent technology to unify and manage disparate communications mechanisms. Microsoft demonstrated its future direction for real-time communications and collaboration (RTC) server software code-named "Greenwich."

Breaking down barriers to knowledge. As the volume of digital information continues to explode, a key goal is to help people not only keep up with the growth, but to effectively harness and distill information into knowledge and appropriate action. Microsoft showcased tools and technologies that will help developers and IT professionals unlock information and more readily analyze, visualize, share and act on that information. Highlighted technologies included the next version of SQL Server (TM) , code-named "Yukon," with technologies that will be the first step toward Microsoft's vision of unified data, as well as the forthcoming SQL Server Notifications Services for SQL Server 2000, which provides a highly scalable notifications system to alert individuals about new or updated data across a variety of delivery channels.

Breaking down barriers to everyday use. Creating next-generation digital user experiences that are more useful and compelling and that work simply is a goal for users and technologists alike. Today, millions of people listen to or download their favorite music from the Internet and more than 35 percent of U.S. households take and store pictures with a digital camera and PC. Yet, it is still a challenge to seamlessly tie together the variety of experiences in a way that is useful and intrinsic to users and their needs. Microsoft highlighted key upcoming technologies designed to advance the quality of the user experience, including Windows XP Media Center Edition.

Customer Experiences

During the briefing, Microsoft executives Eric Rudder and Jeff Raikes each addressed how technology investments in the next phase of .NET will benefit a number of customer audiences by delivering an experience very different than the past.

Developers

Eric Rudder, senior vice president of the Developer and Platform Evangelism Division, provided an overview of future versions of Microsoft's flagship developer tool, Visual Studio .NET. Rudder highlighted forthcoming versions of Visual Studio "Everett" edition and Visual Studio for "Yukon." The products will be designed to take advantage of Windows .NET Server and "Yukon," respectively. Rudder also demonstrated Web Matrix, an easy-to-use Web development tool recently released to the Web, which has had tremendous response from the broader developer community as evidenced by more than 100,000 downloads.

IT Professionals

.NET is aimed squarely at three of the biggest IT pain points: connecting disparate systems inside the organization and with business partners, addressing the applications backlog through improved developer productivity, and helping IT "do more with less" in the current economic climate. Rudder also outlined a renewed focus on deployment and operations, including efforts to use Web services infrastructure to make management intrinsic to all applications as well as integrated management solutions that combine development, deployment and operations into a unified process for managing the applications life cycle and delivering customer benefit. The company demonstrated for the first time its "Server Manager Project," which builds on the capabilities of Microsoft Operations Manager and Application Center to deliver end-to-end service management of Web-based applications to allow quicker analysis and resolution of problems.

Information Workers

Jeff Raikes, group vice president of the Productivity and Business Services Group, discussed the challenges that businesses and information workers are currently facing -- such as productivity, organizational and IT efficiency, and disconnected islands of data -- and outlined the key investments Microsoft is making to address these issues. Raikes announced version two of the Office XP Web Services Toolkit, tools that use XML to unlock the data within organizations in a way that is useful and relevant for information workers. Raikes also articulated a vision for the future of the various software investments that companies make on behalf of their information workers, including productivity applications, business applications and collaboration software. Each of these categories is evolving to take advantage of XML Web services and will drive better decision-making, collaboration and productivity.

Consumers

Throughout the day, Microsoft demonstrated how XML Web services will enable a broad array of rich and compelling next-generation user experiences that will break down the barriers to trust, everyday use and people. Specifically, Microsoft showed how forthcoming Passport technology will enable users to have more fine-grained control over how their personal information is managed online as well as how Windows XP Media Center Edition will bring the power of the Windows-based PC to home entertainment. In addition, Microsoft demonstrated future technologies that will enable a unified treatment of people and groups across a range of applications. Microsoft also demonstrated future technology that integrates XML-based Web services, allowing for new visualization and presentation via an immersive, multimedia experience.

Microsoft also highlighted MSN® 8, the newest version of MSN, which will debut this fall, to deliver a smart client with rich offline capabilities that incorporate building-block services such as Passport and .NET Alerts. In addition, MSN 8 will feature dramatically improved spam protection, online safety and security features such as parental-control features and virus protection, as well as a personalized user experience through a new My MSN home page. And, because it deploys updated software seamlessly in the background with availability as a subscription service independent of underlying access, MSN 8 is an example of software as a service in both the technical and business sense.

Enabling Partner Opportunity

Microsoft's technology investments go beyond creating new customer experiences and extend to incredible opportunity for the industry in general and industry partners in particular. Microsoft outlined the principles of the company's long-standing commitment to industry partners, including low cost of doing business and how .NET provides the industry's best total cost of ownership benefits by enabling partners to take advantage of existing skills, investments and assets; faster time to market via an integrated suite of highly productive developer tools and consistent programming across all tiers of an application; and increased revenue opportunities through relevant solutions for IT professionals, business decision-makers and information workers in any industry. Such principles foster the development of a dynamic, healthy partner ecosystem comprising business application vendors, systems integrators, service providers and hardware vendors of all types and sizes.

Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq "MSFT") is the worldwide leader in software, services and Internet technologies for personal and business computing. The company offers a wide range of products and services designed to empower people through great software -- any time, any place and on any device.

Microsoft, Visual Studios, Windows and MSN are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. in the United States and/or other countries.

The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

Note to editors: If you are interested in viewing additional information on Microsoft, please visit the Microsoft Web page at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/ on Microsoft's corporate information pages. Web links, telephone numbers and titles were correct at time of publication, but may since have changed. Journalists and analysts may contact Microsoft's Rapid Response Team for additional assistance.


Posted by Portuno Diamo at 12:33 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 29 April 2008 1:01 AM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older